D
Deleted member 3014
Guest
If I had got to a point where I was being appointed to ref a world cup quarter final, I would assume the people appointing me want the referee they have appointed to turn up, not some weird conflicted version of that person. I'm not the terrifying disciplinarian that some people on here claim to be, but I like to think that I have a good grasp of the laws, and I'm perfectly comfortable with the idea that what I'm being asked to do is enforce them.
So yeah, I like to think that if I found myself in the middle of a WC QF, I'd referee in the manner that got me there - mandatory cautions and all.
And you're comfortable with the idea that a player who dived twice might have scored the goal that kept Brazil in the game and potentially led to knocking Belgium out? You'd be fine with that if we sub the word "England" in for "Belgium" in that sentence?
Match control and low number of cautions are nice, well done ref. But you still have to get the basics right first.
I’m talking about Croatia v Russia the thread title & topic of standing infront of the quick free kick, the Brazilian ref contolled the game well issuing two cautions.
I didn’t see the Neymar dives so can’t comment on them, although I hear they are pretty scandalous.