You can't say that sentence on TV though.
Why?
You can't say that sentence on TV though.
Why?
I've always seen Webb as very well spokenWebb has done a much better job on TV here in the US when he's been asked to explain certain decisions in MLS.
I would certainly hope soit will be used as an example of what not to do.
I'd rather they explained it correctly and nobody got it, than explain it incorrectly and everybody understand it.It's too technical and only us weirdos on a referee forum knows what it means.
I'd rather they explained it correctly and nobody got it, than explain it incorrectly and everybody understand it.
I find his positioning in general play is too Central and sometimes in the middle of the crowd of players around the PA But no clangers so far.Referee has impressed me so far, made it extremely clear he'd seen the touch for the tackle in the box, no hesitation.
Meanwhile, top rugby refs often appear on tv for discussions about decisions, they're respected and explain things clearly. Imagine Jon Moss on sky sports talking about past decisions.
Meanwhile, top rugby refs often appear on tv for discussions about decisions, they're respected and explain things clearly. Imagine Jon Moss on sky sports talking about past decisions.
Given Bobby Madleys refusal to give him the time of day at Anfield last season, I think BBC Alba repeat of last Tuesdays weather forecast might get more viewers
No VAR which is a good start (unless I missed it)
The fact that there wasn't even a noticible delay with the VAR checking the 4th goal shows the improved efficiency compared to the England trials.
P.s did they show any footage of the lads fully kited up in the booth?
You're really rooting for the whole VAR thing. That makes us polar oppositesThe fact that there wasn't even a noticible delay with the VAR checking the 4th goal shows the improved efficiency compared to the England trials.