one
RefChat Addict
Agreed, yet the only speed he reviewed the second penalty was in slow mo, against the protocol. To fully appreciate the extent of the dive (or the lack of obviousness of the foul) it has to be in full speed. I can't justify the second one being a clear and obvious error using the same standard as used for the first one. It's the inconsistency of VAR that bugs me.The first penalty wasn't clear and obvious. How many times do we go through this? If you have to slow mo and zoom in to see who's foot got there first. It is NOT CLEAR or OBVIOUS.
Last edited: