So if I understand correctly basically means a yellow card shown for dissent (player sin binned) is effectively no card at all!
This has recipe for disaster, confusion, conflict and aggravation written all over it!
The fact that a sin bin is not the same as a caution is hardly the most confusing aspect of the laws of the game. It's just unfamiliar (for now).
And what's wrong with the current system of two cautions = one dismissal? Is that too simple or too hard? Why change?Well you seem to have understood it perfectly. How hard can it be?
And what's wrong with the current system of two cautions = one dismissal? Is that too simple or too hard? Why change?
So last night was the League meeting of the local league i sit on the committee for, 50 club secretaries were in attendance. We mentioned that we have been asked if we wish to take part in the pilot and that we would be asking for opinions via email in the next few weeks.
We asked for some brief feedback from the clubs and not 1 person seemed to be in favour of it, not 1.
if you receive two yellows, you should be gone.
I agree with the second part...You would be gone (but you can be subbed). Your team have already been down to 10 men for 20 minutes. That's not as bad as being down to 10 men for the rest of the match (assuming there's more than 20 minutes left) but the first card was far worse than it would have been previously.
In 6 years and about 200 games I've dismissed a player for 2 yellows for dissent once. So this is a bit of a non-issue.
The average uneducated coach/parent on the sidelines will be screaming blue murder as to why you have done a Graham Poll and yellow carded a player 3 times and yet he/she hasn't been red carded and is now being substituted!How hard can it be?