I'm sorry, but you've just posted a picture of the ball hitting her arm while it is close to her body and when it was kicked at her by an opponent from close range. Incidentally, 'close' does not mean 'pinned tight against the body,' it just means not too far away from the body, which this player's arm is not, at least as far as I'm concerned. As others have pointed out, the IFAB had specifically said that the new laws would mean players did not have to run around with their arms pinned to their sides, to avoid being penalised for handling.
I wouldn't have said this is handball even under the new laws. They say that:
The explanation goes on to say that:
The ball was kicked at this player by "another player who is close" and for me, her arm was both close to her body and in a natural position, or at least certainly not in what the explanation says is the unnatural position of above the level of her shoulder.
Maybe I'm reading this completely wrong but I thought this was actually a fairly clear example of what is not supposed to be handball under the new laws.