one
RefChat Addict
Where is it in the LOTG? It may well be in there but i coudn't find it.And now the LOTG trump the original IFAB VAR protocol.
Where is it in the LOTG? It may well be in there but i coudn't find it.And now the LOTG trump the original IFAB VAR protocol.
I don't disagree with anything you're saying. But I don't think anybody is naive to it either. The approach you're discussing is biased. It corrupts the game. How it is and how it should be are often different things. Referees shouldn't be there as a match producer. That's a complete perversion of their role and the LOTG. But it's also why the top referees aren't necessarily the best referees.This forum has been interesting to observe during the World Cup.
A few of us (myself included) have been judging referees on how we think FIFA will judge the referees performance. The criteria being no major errors, limiting soft cautions, and an overall match management.
Most of you are judging referees on how you think they should be calling the match or how you would call the match on your Sunday league game.
The referees are here to help put on a spectacle. Ronaldo being suspended for the third match after getting a yellow for dissent in the first game and a yellow for diving in the second game is not what the fans, media, and FIFA wants. It maybe what you want as Sunday league refs but it doesn't serve the World Cup.
Now I'm sure I'll be absolutely destroyed for this post so I'll leave it here.
Most of you are judging referees on how you think they should be calling the match or how you would call the match on your Sunday league game.
I made this point and totally agree with you, Too many of us are looking at the games and thinking how it relates to our game this weekend. Other than we use the same object, thats about it
Best referee shirt EVERView attachment 2092
I’ve packed my bags ready for if the call comes.....
If Ronaldo doesn't want to be suspended for 2 dissent cautions, it's entirely within his power to stop dissenting. If FIFA don't want Ronaldo suspended for 2 dissent cautions, it's entirely within their power to change the competition rules so that 2 yellows =/= a match off. If FIFA don't want card heavy ref's, the can pick different ones and should be encouraging no soft yellows right down to L7.This forum has been interesting to observe during the World Cup.
A few of us (myself included) have been judging referees on how we think FIFA will judge the referees performance. The criteria being no major errors, limiting soft cautions, and an overall match management.
Most of you are judging referees on how you think they should be calling the match or how you would call the match on your Sunday league game.
The referees are here to help put on a spectacle. Ronaldo being suspended for the third match after getting a yellow for dissent in the first game and a yellow for diving in the second game is not what the fans, media, and FIFA wants. It maybe what you want as Sunday league refs but it doesn't serve the World Cup.
Now I'm sure I'll be absolutely destroyed for this post so I'll leave it here.
I have a problem with it. Keeping megastars on the pitch at all costs and tolerating behavior which will be copied the world over. We'll all have a problem with it when our seasons start againI think what people miss here is football doesn't exist for referees, rather referees exist to serve the game. If the owners of the world game decide they want to reduce the number of yellow cards by pretty much removing cautions for SPA then I don't have a problem with that. That is as long as the referees are fully backed for following this guidance that technically goes against the LoTG.
I have a problem with it. Keeping megastars on the pitch at all costs and tolerating behavior which will be copied the world over. We'll all have a problem with it when our seasons start again
For me, and most of us, we are charged with refereeing a game.
This WC is great example of guys refereeing an occasion.
Big difference.
When we learn how to seperate the two, we understand both better
Yep your right, just doesn’t seem right though & the volatile leagues like Spain Italy South America it must feel so odd and alien to those refs having to sit there and take dogs abuse & dissent for 90 mins & in some games let 30-40 fouls or infringements go unpunished.
Refereeing the occasion as instructed & not a game of football, so morally wrong.
Its not wrong! Its why those guys are there! Thats their role, same as it would be yours if you had been appointed to go.
The worst WC final referree in my life was Webb because when it got to the final, he went back to pretending he was reffing Everton v Newcastle instead of continuing in the manner which got him appointed to the final in the first place,
Had he stuck to the way he refereed en route to the final, we would have been spared his shambles.
Don't want to tempt fate but whatever happened to the Russian thugs that we were expecting from this WC??? Are they lying in wait maybe!!!
So your comfortable with them all having to ref to please the organisers and not the Lotg, that surprises me I must admit.
It’s becoming a joke the amount players are getting away with, the refs are looking like complete mugs.
Tango is there from our porcine brotherhood. There is an embarrassing video of him climbing s tree on Away Days on FB... no trouble but high jinksThere waiting for the blades to get out there Sheff, they’ve heard it ain’t a fight until the bramall Lane crew turn up.
When’s your flight have you packed your stone island gear
No diff to the Premiership and so on...