bester
RefChat Addict
Must admit this law change had passed me by even before the recent update.
I'm not as convinced as him that a toe wasn't touching the line
I'm not as convinced as him that a toe wasn't touching the line
Yeah I’ve seen that. What I’m saying is if some part of the body is touching the ground, but there is a foot that isn’t, the wording implies the foot that isn’t could still be considered, because of the use of OR.

But wasn't that an instinctive reaction? how is it deliberate?This one is more interesting
If you got it right, everyone would think you were making it up as you go along... which we usually do anyway
![]()
1.1M views · 10K reactions | Extremely rare situation. #football #handball #goal #redcard #penalty | Referee Channel
Extremely rare situation. #football #handball #goal #redcard #penaltywww.facebook.com