The referee's decision is for him to know and for you to guess.It's the only plausible answer...so show us ffs
In every other sport you'd have a proper explanation immediately. Disgusting we don't
But surely he isn’t influencing with play there?Can only be.
Our posts crossed, but it’s not DOGSO because the chance was still there for a teammate. Ergo, caution is correct.One extreme to the other. In PL, we get countless replays...
Not convinced it was an attempt for the ball by the keeper, but ok, it's the way the game is ref'd at the top so who am I to argue ....
First time I'd seen it I though Defensive DFK. Either that or nothing for me, not a penalty in my eyesNow take the offside out of the equation for a moment, but 20 minutes in, a mother penalty for clattering the attacker making the header?
Being mischievous here but perhaps? Bench seemed to think so!
Doesn’t have to be a good attempt. No way, no how any GK is going to get sent off on that play. Attempt is very broadly interpreted.Our posts crossed, but it’s not DOGSO because the chance was still there for a teammate. Ergo, caution is correct.
How could that possibly be a foul on the attacker? He‘s the one who got the ball. That’s a foul on the GK or nothing.First time I'd seen it I though Defensive DFK. Either that or nothing for me, not a penalty in my eyes
What I thought, on the live view I'd expected a Defensive FK to be honest.How could that possibly be a foul on the attacker? He‘s the one who got the ball. That’s a foul on the GK or nothing.
Ors has a very original style of signaling, slow and deliberate, oftern facing ahead, and not back at the incident area - which you just cannot do in normal football.FT: QAT 0 - 2 ECU
Cautions: 6
Dismissals: 0
Notable Incidents (from what I saw)
- Disallowed Goal for ECU - VAR (Offside) 5'
- Penalty for ECU - Scored 16'
Thoughts on the game and officiating?