The Cooper Test is a widely accepted gold standard test of physical fitness. In the absence of a Lab Test, The Cooper is generally thought of as unsurpassed in terms of an easily accessible and accurate indicator of VO2Max. Yet Referees seem very dismissive of it based on a fairly weak specificity argument. The intriguing aspect from my perspective, is that the shuttle aspect of the Level 4 fitness test falls short (on account of specificity) of the required level of fitness needed to adequately referee a Step 5 game
I've just started per-season training. The L4 17-22 test is my starting point, the L3 15-22 test is an intermediary waymark, whilst the 2600m Cooper is my objective. Only then will I consider myself fit enough to continue as an L4
In the absence of The Cooper and if they really want to improve standards, they should extend the L3 test to L4 and further weed out those not fit enough. They may get an opportunity to do this soon, what with the potential glut of 5s who may target L4
I'm 50, have an obese BMI, haven't lifted a finger for 5 weeks, yet I could go and pass the L4 test this afternoon having drank a bottle of Malbec last night
That can't be right