Agree. The exceptions on that, in youth games, for me is if there is something unusual about the field (e.g., and overhanging tree),,, I'll typically tell the teams, not just the captains. And if it is playoffs, I may tell the teams the ROC for today (e.g., no extra time, straight to KFTM).As little as possible. I am never a fan of the pre-match lecture to the teams... yes, speak with the Coach/Captain about your expectations, but the rest of the players - in one ear, out the other....
That's a dangerous approach in my opinion, the first time there is any kind of dissent and you don't caution for it your match control is at risk.I ask name of captains, brief 20 second chat around my dissent tolerance being zero and I expect captains to deal with players. Toss coin, have a good game.
I get that point and can see it. However, I have found I’ve encountered very little from stating that early. Any I have received have been cautioned. Will look at for future! Thank youThat's a dangerous approach in my opinion, the first time there is any kind of dissent and you don't caution for it your match control is at risk.
This. I say nothing to teams before hand about the game, just general small talk and even with the captains I barely say anything and just get straight into the coin toss. I used to give them a few words but their minds wander and none of them take it in. Let’s just do the toss and get on with the gameWhy bother?
The players aren't interested in what you think or want. Complete waste of time.
I just have my (literally) 5 second spiel to both Captains in the middle before doing the coin toss.
@MumRef - when did anything you said before a match influence how the players behaved or spoke toward you?
I often find the captains are the worst of the offenders, in the first place lolI've found that reminding captains of their responsibility to control their players does have some benefits during the game.
If a player is pushing their luck, I can call the captain over and say "Remember what we discussed before the game? Apply that to this player before I have to take action." It shortcuts the time you have to spend around an angry player and means that when you do call the captain in, you're not starting that process from scratch, you're already at step 2 at the process of making captains believe you will follow through on warnings.
Often true - but the same idea of it being a useful headstart still applies, perhaps even more so.I often find the captains are the worst of the offenders, in the first place lol