The Ref Stop

Penalty goalkeeper 'protest'

The Ref Stop
bester said:
Technically facing the kicker, wonder if referee wouldn't let him turn his back completely.
Click to expand...
I would imagine a coincidence. The way I read law, the goalkeeper not facing the kick would be no different to him being off his line... therefore if the kicker scores no issue, only a retake if keeper saves it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: one
If you can legally play advantage from a one handed throw in by a player who is sitting while taking it... this would be a no brainer.
 
I meant before the whistle, there seemed to be some discussion going on.

You shouldn't be whistling until their positions are compliant with the law, if he turns to not face the kicker after the whistle then the penalty must be taken.
 
RefereeX said:
I would imagine a coincidence. The way I read law, the goalkeeper not facing the kick would be no different to him being off his line... therefore if the kicker scores no issue, only a retake if keeper saves it.
Click to expand...
The crucial difference is that the goalkeeper being on the line facing the kicker is a requirement of Law 14 before the referee can signal for the kick to be taken. As this is never achieved, the referee is incorrect to signal the kick to be taken.

If the GK was facing the correct way then turned after the signal was given then I would agree with you but here, we should be cautioning the GK for delaying the restart and making sure the pre-requisites are in place before the penalty is signalled to be taken.
 
Lesser spotted 'showing a lack of respect for the game'...?
Don't know why that's even in the book. Seems to only exist as a 'get out of jail free card' for when a referee can't justify a caution to an observer, but the observer will always reject it anyway so may as well take it out the book
 
Big Cat said:
Lesser spotted 'showing a lack of respect for the game'...?
Don't know why that's even in the book. Seems to only exist as a 'get out of jail free card' for when a referee can't justify a caution to an observer, but the observer will always reject it anyway so may as well take it out the book
Click to expand...
Tht’s a problem for the observer, not the Laws. It’s relatively recently that as a group we have forgotten that the caution is for unsporting behavior and the Laws give examples.
 
socal lurker said:
Tht’s a problem for the observer, not the Laws. It’s relatively recently that as a group we have forgotten that the caution is for unsporting behavior and the Laws give examples.
Click to expand...
The issue in the UK is that match officials tend to use the FA caution codes when giving a reason for a caution, whereas as an Observer I will have recorded USB ("Unsporting Behaviour")
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top