As red as red can be.
Help keep RefChat running, any donation would be appreciated
I would add, that it’s stupid either way. Raise your hands onto another players face and you are asking for the ref to make a decision.
As red as red can be.
It's 'soft', but the force was not 'negligible' IMO.I’m not sure I would have given a red. Was it with force? Was it a slap or more of a face push?
Interested to hear what everyone thinks.
Obviously I can't speak for whoever the VAR was last night, but if it were me then I would have recommended a review had the referee not given a red on-field. The angle from behind the goal shows that the head/face contact is with sufficient force to jolt Keane's head sideways - IMO it's clear and obvious that it's more than negligible.I do wonder if the VAR would have recommended a review had the referee not issued a red card. My initial impression is that if the referee saw it but didn't issue a red card (i.e. cautioned for it) then VAR wouldn't have got involved but if the ref had his back to it, VAR probably would have got involved. Fortunately I'm in a position to be able to get the answer to that question.
I haven't seen any decent angle of this to be honest, I gathered it was a relatively light push/gentle slap to the face (which I still agree if a red card as it's more than neglgible.
I am now of the knowledge that despite there being 40 cameras in operation for VAR, none of them were focussed on Keane and Gueye meaning an intervention would have been difficult had Harrington not gone red on field.
To be fair, I do get why people might be (consciously or subconsciously) looking for reasons not to give a red due to the circumstances. Totally on your side that it has to be a red though.Hold up! There are people that don't think this is a red card?
Its cut and dry a strike to a persons face. It is text book, literally as written, violent conduct.
Quite a lot of people don't think it's a red and no doubt some of that is because it's teammates instead of the opposition but I guess it's also depends on someone's interpretation of what "negilable contact" is.Hold up! There are people that don't think this is a red card?
Its cut and dry a strike to a persons face. It is text book, literally as written, violent conduct.
Agree with that, I can see why non-referees might think it shouldn't be VC, but I'm a bit surprised that some referees think that way. I'd also add two things here ...To be fair, I do get why people might be (consciously or subconsciously) looking for reasons not to give a red due to the circumstances. Totally on your side that it has to be a red though.
Yep, people was probably too broad I admit.Agree with that, I can see why non-referees might think it shouldn't be VC, but I'm a bit surprised that some referees think that way. I'd also add two things here ...
If he'd slapped an opponent like that there would be no debate as the opponent would have thrown himself to the floor, effectively making the referee's decision for him. If this had been a slap on an opponent I doubt anyone would be questioning the red card, but I can't see the difference personally.
Also, look at the reaction of the Everton players, there wasn't a single Everton player who complained about the red card. That to me says that football expects a red card in this situation.
I'm amazed they appealed, doubt it took too long to refuse it.Extended bans for frivilous appeals no longer a thing?
![]()
Idrissa Gueye: Everton red card appeal rejected by FA, says David Moyes
The Football Association rejected Everton's appeal against Idrissa Gueye's red card without providing an explanation, David Moyes says.www.bbc.co.uk
Not since 2018.Extended bans for frivilous appeals no longer a thing?