i'm coming round to the ideaAnything that is harmful to FIFA/UEFA is OK by me. I could cope with a fracturing of elite level football
It's a difficult thing to put into words, but it's always satisfying to watch something rot from the corei'm coming round to the idea
My assumption is that they plan to start off free to air but will sneak behind a paywall once its popularity grows. After all, the Premier League used to be on free to view tv...The free to air statement was bizarre. Are “A22” the same numpties that managed the press releases last time?
“Games will be available to watch for free on a new streaming platform called Unify.”
What? As Rusty highlights. Never gonna happen. The US owners in particular are all about the TV money. Totally fishy.
My assumption is that they plan to start off free to air but will sneak behind a paywall once its popularity grows. After all, the Premier League used to be on free to view tv...
Soccer is also a harder sport than mostfor ad revenue due to the lack of time outs or other real breaks during game play. Ads between plays are much more attractive than pre-game or half time ads, and the in game ads over the game can’t be super effective (ergo not as lucrative). In the US years back it was common to either just take a commercial break with the game going on or have commercials that took up most of the screen with the game image without sound ongoing on a part of the screen. (I have wondered if we were going to see leagues mandate that a VAR review has to take 30 seconds so they can squeeze a TV commercial in …)However, even without subscriber revenue you still get ad revenue. Live sport is just about the only thing left that people watch as it's broadcast so it commands a premium.
Did it? Sky had it from day 1, with BBC getting the highlights package, and I don't recall Sky ever being free to air. Sky's money was the whole point of it, the clubs collectively went from receiving £11 million a year to over £60 million overnight.My assumption is that they plan to start off free to air but will sneak behind a paywall once its popularity grows. After all, the Premier League used to be on free to view tv...
The clubs wouldn't last 5 months, let alone 5 years without the TV revenue. The current TV deal is £6.7 billion for domestic coverage alone, near £1.7 billion a year, take that away and clubs would become insolvent almost instantly.This. The free-to-air thing is a carrot. The whole thing tanked last time because of the fan backlash, and that was mostly because of the closed shop. They've dropped that, which removes the main fan objection, but they need fans on board. Free TV was a totally predictable move, just as is the fact that it will last 5 years at most.
However, even without subscriber revenue you still get ad revenue. Live sport is just about the only thing left that people watch as it's broadcast so it commands a premium.
Correct, the PL was always about the money.Did it? Sky had it from day 1, with BBC getting the highlights package, and I don't recall Sky ever being free to air. Sky's money was the whole point of it, the clubs collectively went from receiving £11 million a year to over £60 million overnight.