I refereed an U12 game I’ve talked about on here I fair few times. A minute left, a player goes through an opposition player that they’d been warring with all match. It wasn’t a definite yellow, but I wouldn’t have blamed a ref for pulling out the card. I go for a public warning, to which his father (I presume) tells the kid to ignore the ref and keep getting stuck in. Less than 20 seconds later, he makes a late challenge on the same player, taking his Dads advice. He takes the yellow, and after receiving it, winks at his Dad and gives him a thumbs up and cheeky smile, with the Dad congratulating him on getting “stuck in.”Also think if your reffing juniors then that could make a difference. I ref U14-16 and I only send in S1-3 and 6
It is so easy now, uses a system called Whole Game System (granted that is a little flaky but I won't go there). You enter the game by choosing the competition which then gives you drop down options for home and away teams. Once that is done you enter each caution by selecting the player from a drop down list and the caution code. Same for red cards now as well, you only have to type anything for extraordinary incidents.As an Australian referee can I just ask what UK refs need to do for cautions? Do you need to write up a report for each, or just indicate it has been given? Here in Western Australia we just enter online the game result, plus goalscorers (with times). For cautions we indicate time and basic reason (USB, Delay Restart, Persistent etc. I have never heard of all these other codes s-1 etc you talk about). We only have to submit an online report for a red card offence. I don't think we fine anyone for a caution, just give a ban if they tot up too many (although tbh it's not something I really concern myself with).
what UK refs need to do for cautions? Do you need to write up a report for each, or just indicate it has been given?
I agree. Alas, we may have deforested @forrestforeverHere is my two cents worth of the OP.
@forrestforever my guess is that you are a relatively new referee but care about your refereeing. That's why you are here. You had an interesting game and came on here to share your experience with the rest of us and thanks for doing that. You thought you had a pretty good game and from our view point we think so too bar one part. We think this is a very big mistake. My take is you thought it was trivial but now accepted our view and it is big of you to do so. From other posts I take it you have tried to obfuscate your identity. I'd like to look at this in a positive way. You have realised it is a big mistake (and you are rectifying it), you care about your refereeing and don't want this to damage your reputation. I can understand that. The reaction here has been pretty harsh and rightly so. Here is my advice
- Sort out the reporting mess
- Learn from this experience
- Forget about your current account on this forum
- Create a new account and do comeback, contribute and get advice
The community here can sometimes be harsh but for the most part provide good advice. This forum is an invaluable free tool for any referee. Make use of it, and sometimes cop the criticism on the chin.
Yep RefChat and LoftForWords for me only as well.I agree. Alas, we may have deforested @forrestforever
I think that David Baddiel documentary has made me appreciate some pitfalls of communicating via Social Media (exclusively RefChat for me haha)
Our Woodsman Newbie just didn't realize he was sticking his head in the lions mouth by posting his cardinal sin on the Forum. Even if we don't hear from him again, he may have learned one thing from us!
I don't 'ignore' anyone TBHYep RefChat and LoftForWords for me only as well.
Although the number of 'ignored' threads and posters I now have on the latter means its become a bit 'quiet' on there for me
I would say that as you’re being paid to do a job, part of that job is I putting cards into whole game and if we could pick an choose which ones to submit, that option would be there for us.Yep it probably shouldn’t but it does for me. Partly because it’s not them being fined but their parents.