I think it's actually been drawn to mark the back of the attackers boot, showing it to be in front of any part of the defender able to play the ballThe line is also not correct, drawn at the hand of the defender…
Good point!I think it's actually been drawn to mark the back of the attackers boot, showing it to be in front of any part of the defender able to play the ball
You're doing away with offsides where the attacker has no obvious advantage, at least. There's no concept of 'level' anymore, you're either on or off.Wow, so we go from judging marginal offsides to judging marginal offsides. What is the point?!
I suppose that is one benefit. But then we get the new debate of where does the advantage start and end? Where does daylight start and end?You're doing away with offsides where the attacker has no obvious advantage, at least. There's no concept of 'level' anymore, you're either on or off.
Exactly. In grassroots games, AR's are often working in different teams every week, without comms or a 4th official to watch benches and misconduct etc, and have to do all their other duties. This would just be another burden to think about.plus at levels without VAR it would be a nightmare for the ARs.
There's a list of all currently approved trials that can be tried next season on the IFAB website. This isn't one of them.Being lazy here and done zero research other than checking if it has already been posted.
But I seen this tweet/ x by Stan Collymore
I don't disagree with you, just putting the view across!I suppose that is one benefit. But then we get the new debate of where does the advantage start and end? Where does daylight start and end?
Even more so given flash lag means you are looking for close to daylight as it it is...It would risk killing football as a spectacle. Defenders wouldn't be able to hold a high line so would have to drop off.
It would inevitably also lead to more offside mistakes being made. Being able to see whether a part of an attacker is head of a defender is a lot easier than seeing if there is daylight between the two. VAR would correct them at the top levels but that would just slow things down even more as there would be more checks, plus at levels without VAR it would be a nightmare for the ARs.
Again, this is not real. No such trial has been approved by the IFAB for next season.This would be the death of football - imagine trying to judge if a trailing ankle is behind a knee of the defender etc?! As it stands now, it’s usually the head/chest that is furthest forward which is much more obvious and easier to see from 30 yards away. Also imagine the appeals from players who could argue about a trailing foot keeping them onside…
But the managers and fans would stop moaning about bad offside decisions….That would force every team to defend really low. Do not think that would be attractive to watch.