Is there any reason I should be taking names instead?
What do other people on here do?
What was the procedure you were taught on your course?
I usually just take numbers down and get the name from the team sheet after the game, it's quicker and there's no chance they can give a false name or another player's name.
Is there any reason I should be taking names instead?
What do other people on here do?
I’m a good boy and follow procedure correctly but I would say that 8/10 players look surprised at how long it’s taking and the fact that I even want to talk to them. Partly last weeks ref’s fault and mostly what they see on TV with the flash cards or cards from across the pitch. On the other side of the debate I can also think of a number of times where the slower procedure has cooled the temperature of the match and helped settle things.
Only with a red I think. A caution, no. You can easily take the yellow out in your hand to indicate the your next actions but you should then follow the procedure as states in the guidelines.I agree with this but also think the opposite can be true. Sometimes a quick flash of a card can diffuse a situation that might otherwise turn nasty - players see you acting quick, rather than rushing in, they know you're dealing with it. Works both ways I think.
The FA have recently issued guidance to all referees who operate at Level 2B, 3 and 4 (and to the Observers who watch them) to say that they should follow the correct procedure. This procedure is stop the game, isolate the player, take their name, warn them as to their future conduct and then show the yellow card.
Any referee not following this procedure, for example by flashing the card, can expect to have it noted in their Observer report. It could take an 8.0 to a 7.0 for Application of Law.
Neither are some of the other observer criterion. They are standards based around the lotg of what is expected to reach the next level of refereeing.Surely this is unfair as correct caution procedure isn’t in law? Correct me if I’m wrong but I’m fairly certain it isn’t.
Suppose you’re rightNeither are some of the other observer criterion. They are standards based around the lotg of what is expected to reach the next level of refereeing.
As @Brian Hamilton says, that policy is against FA guidence. Only L1 and 2A are allowed this policy.
If there is an appeal, how can you define a claim of mistaken identity if you don't take the name? The FA would have to let the player off and possible charge you for failing to follow correct procedure. If you were on a promotion scheme, that could cost you the next level.
Also, some referees are taking the names by use of their smartwatches and apps. While the FA guidance does not cover this directly, you need to show that you understand the reasoning.
If you have teamsheets, put the names in the book before you commence the game - soooo much easier.
Yeh. An observation comprises a number of criteria. Only 1 of those is application of law.Is there a difference between a Law, a Protocol and a Guidance? I know a lawyer would chew you up on those!!
hi sam, so do you write the players number and the time and can spanish referees buy the red/yellow cards with the emblem on then,