Search results

Just need the image of two spikes due to two points of contact, which there isn't. So it's out of sync/calibrated incorrectly. This then opens it up to further questions. Is the technology for close offsides working as expected? What about goal line technology?

Any thoughts on the 'snicko' drama yesterday? It looks like a glaring error from this new technology? There is a spike, but then no spike immediately after it when the defender heads it. To me, it looks like the technology was out of sync!

Not sure how this wasn't given as a penalty. Glaring error by VAR not to award a stonewall penalty. Lucky Lucky England!

DOGSO - ball bas been hoofed up, so cannot guarantee DOGSO at all. McGinn - played the foul and clearly dived McTomminay - again, looking for the foul

Not sure what was going on with the second red card? Mexican player put himself there and the SA action to move past him most certainly is not VC. Hope glancing hands to the face isn't the low bar for VC this world cup otherwise every match someone is going to be sent off

Where was the caution to Silva for delaying the restart for his 60 seconds of clapping fans and guard of honour? ;)

Every match week there are 'natural coming together' at corners or 'both are holding each other' or a more recent term 'contact was made before the ball was in play'. Without Raya's arm being pulled down, shirt being pulled from behind and arm across the face/body, that's a simple catch.

Pick from any of the 3 fouls committed.

There is more aggression and violence in that punch than there was for recent red cards. For example, the hair pulls and the non red for Gabriel. Are you referring to the first 'DOGSO'? I can see why that wasn't given. It was a mess and both players look drunk. The one I'm referring to is the...

Dogso: Brentford player crossed the ball into the Brentford player just inside the penalty area. Brentford player was tripped and pushed from behind so he didn't have a tap in. Clear DOGSO and red not given. Silva punched a Brentford player in the leg. It wasn't even disguised as anything...

Simone has been just as bad. Would have been worse if the scoreline was the other way round.

The ball changes it's trajectory and Sesko's fingers move. Not sure what else you need? It's a horrendous mistake by VAR. If you watch the after match 'analysis' they are all joking about it. Even Keane was in on the jokes!

Interesting here some are saying it should be a red card, but with the United Hair pull it shouldn't have been one? There was probably less force in Gabriel's head movement than the hair pull. I guess it shows everyone has varying opinions and why VAR is always under scrutiny! Disclaimer: I...

I have a feeling the player was offside hence no action taken.

Don't give Arteta ideas!

Wouldn't any type of hair pull be under 'excessive force'? It's not a footballing action and therefore any force behind pulling hair would be deemed excessive?

I really am unsure what the debate is about? First action - normal and a footballing action jumping for the ball. Second movement - yanks the hair. Sorry, but I can't see anything other than a red. If, however, it was all one action and chance involved, I could see why it's could be debatable.

I think it's really unprofessional. Tell them to go away, if they don't, caution them all. Its intimidation from the Chelsea players.