Search results

1) both sent off or both caution. You can't send off Foden and not Bruno. 2) Enzo is trying to head the ball, he is clearly interfering. Only thing I feel that is saving them is Martinez and keeper were not going to get it, so are they thinking no interference took place? Ref should have had...

Gabriel had nothing to do with the pushing between Konsa and a Sunderland player. So the mistaken identity would be because Konsa pushed someone and the ref thought it was Gabriel, when it wasn't, he wasn't near the situation. So the offense was the tit for tat pushing. Not sure how anyone can...

This is why I said the correct process but the wrong decision. Ref has seen only Konsa's arms, hasn't seen the Judo roll and has assumed it was Konsa's action to bring down Ballard. VAR can see the whole action, but hasn't re-reffed the game because there was some mutual holding at the...

I'm not sure what you are referring to? Gabriel wasn't part of it until he pulled Konsa away. This was at the end of the match

Agreed, however, I guess the process was correct? Correct process but incorrect decision as both we holding, but Ballard's judo throw caused the fall

It was a shame VAR didn't get involved with the Gabriel caution yesterday. Mistaken identity. Gabriel went over to Konsa and pulled him away. The ref cautioned Gabriel instead of Konsa. I think this would have been a Premier first for mistaken identity?

Yeah, that's what I meant. Basically the same thing. Complaining about the lack of card, which as you said, is totally braindead as it was coming.

Palmer should have had a caution for 1) kicking MLS and then 2) the kick through the back of him to stop and attack. Could have easily had a caution for the number of fouls too... Very lucky to even be on the pitch. Tzolis got a caution for complaining about being tackled on the attack...

Ref was very relaxed on countdowns. It's like he forgot and was reminded at HT.

Just need the image of two spikes due to two points of contact, which there isn't. So it's out of sync/calibrated incorrectly. This then opens it up to further questions. Is the technology for close offsides working as expected? What about goal line technology?

Any thoughts on the 'snicko' drama yesterday? It looks like a glaring error from this new technology? There is a spike, but then no spike immediately after it when the defender heads it. To me, it looks like the technology was out of sync!

Not sure how this wasn't given as a penalty. Glaring error by VAR not to award a stonewall penalty. Lucky Lucky England!

DOGSO - ball bas been hoofed up, so cannot guarantee DOGSO at all. McGinn - played the foul and clearly dived McTomminay - again, looking for the foul

Not sure what was going on with the second red card? Mexican player put himself there and the SA action to move past him most certainly is not VC. Hope glancing hands to the face isn't the low bar for VC this world cup otherwise every match someone is going to be sent off

Where was the caution to Silva for delaying the restart for his 60 seconds of clapping fans and guard of honour? ;)

Every match week there are 'natural coming together' at corners or 'both are holding each other' or a more recent term 'contact was made before the ball was in play'. Without Raya's arm being pulled down, shirt being pulled from behind and arm across the face/body, that's a simple catch.

Pick from any of the 3 fouls committed.

There is more aggression and violence in that punch than there was for recent red cards. For example, the hair pulls and the non red for Gabriel. Are you referring to the first 'DOGSO'? I can see why that wasn't given. It was a mess and both players look drunk. The one I'm referring to is the...

Dogso: Brentford player crossed the ball into the Brentford player just inside the penalty area. Brentford player was tripped and pushed from behind so he didn't have a tap in. Clear DOGSO and red not given. Silva punched a Brentford player in the leg. It wasn't even disguised as anything...