Caution + idfk. Dogso can only be by handball or other offence punishable by a direct free kick or penalty.
Caution + idfk. Dogso can only be by handball or other offence punishable by a direct free kick or penalty.
But I am of course happy to stand corrected.A little lower on that page, second paragraph under Denying a goal scoring opportunity. For some reason copy isn't working.
Anyway, it talks about the referee awarding a penalty kick. For me that implies that it has to be a dfk/penalty worthy offence.
A little lower on that page, second paragraph under Denying a goal scoring opportunity. For some reason copy isn't working.
Anyway, it talks about the referee awarding a penalty kick. For me that implies that it has to be a dfk/penalty worthy offence.
Law 12 clearly states that a player who verbally distracts an opponent during play or at a restart must be cautioned.
Therefore he cannot be dismissed whatever the outcome of his action. Also, as the offence is specifically mentioned within Law 12 it does not fall into the category of "any other offence, not mentioned in the Laws, for which play is stopped to caution or send off a player". As such, the restart cannot be an indirect free kick.
Law 12 clearly states that a player who verbally distracts an opponent during play or at a restart must be cautioned.
Therefore he cannot be dismissed whatever the outcome of his action. Also, as the offence is specifically mentioned within Law 12 it does not fall into the category of "any other offence, not mentioned in the Laws, for which play is stopped to caution or send off a player". As such, the restart cannot be an indirect free kick.
Law 12 sets out a list of offences for which a player MUST be cautioned for unsporting behaviour. The last one on the list isI am probably being thick here Brian. I am genuinely am not following you.
Is verbally distracting an opponent not punishable by an IDFK? if it is surely it's a DOGSO.
unless the argument is that the IDFK is because the game has been stopped to caution the player.
I am probably being thick here Brian. I am genuinely am not following you.
Is verbally distracting an opponent not punishable by an IDFK? if it is surely it's a DOGSO.
unless the argument is that the IDFK is because the game has been stopped to caution the player.
You wouldn't award an IFK?