The Ref Stop

Ecuador v Germany

Donate to RefChat

Help keep RefChat running, any donation would be appreciated

Surely VAR should be staying out of subjective decisions? Subjective is the polar opposite to clear and obvious, VAR should be going nowhere near subjective decisions.

Although I don’t actually think this was a subjective decision.
Surprised at this post @RustyRef. 😄

Subjective vs factual is one of the important concepts in VAR. Subjective is not the opposite of C&O. It is the opposite of factual. Only Subjective decisions can be clearly and obvously wrong. Factual decision are black and white and not subject to ones opinion/interpretation.

This is from the VAR protocol, the section on when VAR should recommend a review.

1000044016.jpg
 
The Ref Stop
Surprised at this post @RustyRef. 😄

Subjective vs factual is one of the important concepts in VAR. Subjective is not the opposite of C&O. It is the opposite of factual. Only Subjective decisions can be clearly and obvously wrong. Factual decision are black and white and not subject to ones opinion/interpretation.

This is from the VAR protocol, the section on when VAR should recommend a review.

View attachment 8758
Poor law wording again, I just do t see how something that is subjective can be a clear and obvious error. VAR was brought in to remove absolute howlers from the game, if something is subjective it doesn’t fall into that category in my opinion.
 
I think it’s a language difference.
Subjective as the opposite of factual, every decision bar offside / ball in and out of play etc will be, no matter how obvious it is
 
The degree of subjectivity is quite subjective
Factual v subjective is either factual and subjective, depending on perspective

Said it all along, foul play is quite subjective and we won't all agree
C&O however, is a whole different level of subjectivity that we'll never agree on. And it usually leaves us incredibly more incensed
 
Back
Top