The Ref Stop

West Ham's Earring

Donate to RefChat

Help keep RefChat running, any donation would be appreciated

DJIC

RefChat Addict
Why are both the BBC & The Telegraph reporting the FA rule forbids jewellery being taped up? Its a universal law covered in IFAB Law 4 Safety!

Doesn't help us at grass roots football.
1768226380661.jpeg

Cascarino was allowed to play without tape covering her inner-ear piercing during her time at Juventus.

However, the FA rule specifies that even using tape to cover any jewellery is not permitted in England.

Guarino said: "She [Cascarino] can't take off this earring; it's like a tattoo. She needs a doctor to take it off and she had tape.

"She played in the Champions League with tape, so I can't understand how we missed using a player in a game for this."
The Telegraph

West Ham player denied debut because of earring

Estelle Cascarino was prevented from being introduced as a second-half substitute at Chelsea with FA rules forbidding items of jewellery

Rita Guarino was taking charge of her first West Ham match at Kingsmeadow, but instead of lamenting the gulf between her struggling side and the team who have won the last six WSL titles, the new manager was instead left baffled by league regulations.

At the start of the second half, Guarino tried to bring on Cascarino, who is on loan from Juventus, but because the player was wearing an earring that could not be removed, one she had covered with tape, she was unable to take the field.

In bizarre scenes which resulted in a delay to the start of the second half, West Ham began with 10 players before Inès Belloumou made her way back onto the field.

“She [Cascarino] can’t take off this earring; it’s like a tattoo, she needs a doctor to take this off and she had tape. She played in the Champions League with tape, so I can’t understand how we missed [using] a player in a game for this,” Guarino said.

The 28-year-old French defender has played for Juventus without tape covering the inner-ear piercing, but Football Association rules forbid all items of jewellery and do not allow tape.
 
The Ref Stop
Because she has obviously got away with wearing it taped up during her time in Italy and wherever else she has played. So would just cause more confusion if they said IFAB laws don’t allow it as some smart so and so would point out it was OK before she moved to England.

The BBC have run the same story and in their article they have an interview with Fara Williams who absolutely blames the player and manager and said she was pleased she wasn’t allowed to come on.
 
Also interesting to see that the 4th official who correctly refused her entry onto the FoP was Lisa Benn. I bet she needed that like a hole in the head, but she did what was required at the time it was needed.
 
The BBC have run the same story and in their article they have an interview with Fara Williams who absolutely blames the player and manager and said she was pleased she wasn’t allowed to come on.

Tara also said it used to be OK to tape up. As far as I remember, that has never actually been true, but may be more about past enforcement.
 
Well I'm pretty sure she played in the Euros last Summer, sure I remember her scoring because they did the whole thing of is she any relation to Tony, feels very unlikely that FIFA tournament officials would allow it. Unless she had it done since then of course.
 
Tara also said it used to be OK to tape up. As far as I remember, that has never actually been true, but may be more about past enforcement.
If my memory serves me correctly, there used to be guidance from The FA that a plain wedding band could be taped up if it couldn't be removed (despite the LotG explicitly prohibiting "any kind of jewellery" since 1997).
 
I'm glad this has been highlighted as will help grassroots.

It's been an issue every time I've done a girls or women's game. Not one or two usually the majority of players will have earrings.
Obviously not being enforced on a weekly basis.

.
 
What are the odds on jewellery following the footsteps of shinpads in the LOTG?

I'd guess quite long.

The key difference is who the risk belongs to.

Shin pads are to protect the wearer. Largely it is that persons appetite for risk and how much protection they want that matters and is confirmed by the clarification.

Jewellery impact the safety of not just the wearer but also those around them. This is not for the wearer to decide what other people risk factors should be and so I think they are very different and will be less likely to follow on the same pathway.
 
I'd guess quite long.

The key difference is who the risk belongs to.

Shin pads are to protect the wearer. Largely it is that persons appetite for risk and how much protection they want that matters and is confirmed by the clarification.

Jewellery impact the safety of not just the wearer but also those around them. This is not for the wearer to decide what other people risk factors should be and so I think they are very different and will be less likely to follow on the same pathway.
True in some cases but not in most. The OP for example presents no danger to others. Rubber band, etc etc. One can even argue most jewellery present no danger to oneself.

The general principle of safety still stands if they take the jewellery section out.
"A player must not use equipment or wear anything that is dangerous"
 
True in some cases but not in most. The OP for example presents no danger to others. Rubber band, etc etc. One can even argue most jewellery present no danger to oneself.

The general principle of safety still stands if they take the jewellery section out.
"A player must not use equipment or wear anything that is dangerous"
I wouldn’t be able to argue that most jewellery presents no danger to oneself. Perhaps I’m just missing it, but I can’t think of any situations when it wouldn’t. The risk may vary from low to high, but still a risk.
 
I wouldn’t be able to argue that most jewellery presents no danger to oneself. Perhaps I’m just missing it, but I can’t think of any situations when it wouldn’t. The risk may vary from low to high, but still a risk.
All relative isn't it? Stepping on to the pitch poses a risk for injury. It's all about what is an acceptable risk.
 
All relative isn't it? Stepping on to the pitch poses a risk for injury. It's all about what is an acceptable risk.
Yes that’s true, but I would relate it to someone leaving a bag on the back seat of the car when parked up - don’t give anyone an opportunity to take it. On a football field, there are enough occasions for a player to get injured & therefore, to minimise the risk as much as possible. Having said that, I am on holiday at the moment & I left my egg sandwiches on the back seat of my car. 😂
 
  • Haha
Reactions: one
Back
Top