Can you explain the OFFINABUS criteria, as you put it, as written in the LOTG?
My point was that what he did was not, in my opinion, offensive, insulting or abusive (self-abusive, perhaps, if one were being obtuse). The first of those is probably the most tricky to ascertain, but it's not like we have the time to stop the game and determine by a vote who deemed the swearing offensive. Perhaps I wrongly assume football people aren't sheltered! In all seriousness, though, I take by implication that you think some words are serious enough to warrant sanction irrespective of context and that the watching public must be taken into account as well.