You don't agree that there should be a proportional number of BAME referees?I just don't agree with the reasons for doing it.
Help keep RefChat running, any donation would be appreciated
You don't agree that there should be a proportional number of BAME referees?I just don't agree with the reasons for doing it.
OK, I'm going to say it, I don't know where you are going with this. You post an article from a known divisive and right wing media organisation without any commentary, and then randomly post on replies. Leading to suggesting white people having to pay more for training and match fees than others, which to the best of my knowledge isn't a thing.what if whites had to pay more for learning to play football, training fees etc then match fees for youth grassroots football - where does all this nonsense end?
There is a huge amount of difference between The FA/County FAs providing funding to run additional referee courses for BAME individuals at a discount, and 'making "whites" pay more'. Your ridiculous whataboutism is much like someone else's on this thread.what if whites had to pay more for learning to play football, training fees etc then match fees for youth grassroots football - where does all this nonsense end?
This is a deliberate misrepresentation of the facts. The fact is that there is a standard fee. The fact is certain groups receive discounts. While this may sound the same as others paying more, it is not. There is a choice in receiving discounts. They can pay the full fee if they wish. There is no choice in "having to pay more".what if whites had to pay more for learning to play football, training fees etc then match fees for youth grassroots football - where does all this nonsense end?
Now you are having your cake an eating it too. You claim that you don't want your colour to make any difference yet you are willing to play the race card when it suites you.Is it something about my name on here that threatens you?
Yes it does. So much so that he is willing to give you a discount on your referee coursesIs it something about my name on here that threatens you?
But if yuu are white you cant get the discount. Hardly a comparrison is itThis is a deliberate misrepresentation of the facts. The fact is that there is a standard fee. The fact is certain groups receive discounts. While this may sound the same as others paying more, it is not. There is a choice in receiving discounts. They can pay the full fee if they wish. There is no choice in "having to pay more".
Now you are having your cake an eating it too. You claim that you don't want your colour to make any difference yet you are willing to play the race card when it suites you.
looks like you are questioning my colour, why because it suits your argument have i disrespected anyone elses colour ethnicicity etc? No, because Im not judging by colour but the payment difference in the article does. The GB news has been questioned as right wing yet it doesnt matter where its reported, what matters is whats being reported and done. Not like anyone is saying its inaccurate.There is a huge amount of difference between The FA/County FAs providing funding to run additional referee courses for BAME individuals at a discount, and 'making "whites" pay more'. Your ridiculous whataboutism is much like someone else's on this thread.
As for you... you signed up to this forum with the username "blackref", yet according to one of your previous posts on this thread, you want to be judged on your "commitmemt[sic] and ability to ref matches", and not the colour of your skin. And now when an admin calls you out on your ridiculous whataboutism, you use the fact that you are black (as far as you've told us, anyway) to try and bait them. Some might consider you posting this article followed by your comments and behaviour in this thread as being deliberately provocative and antagonistic.