Only if the player didn't put a top over his shirt. Its just a warning.Would he not just wear the player's whose wearing his keepers Jersey?
Only if the player didn't put a top over his shirt. Its just a warning.Would he not just wear the player's whose wearing his keepers Jersey?
Thank you ! I wasn’t looking for trouble ( never do ) yiu are correct about the payment ! The lad caused he’s own troubleNot a card for me as I can manage it but obviously it's your game. I would advise not to go looking for trouble (you don't get paid any more for finding it).
I would be very wary of thinking along the terms of "how will they learn life skills". Thats not for us to decide or implement. Dont overthink it.
Technically incorrect as it would have the wrong number (but probably fine at many levels).Would he not just wear the player's whose wearing his keepers Jersey?
Yes. I was assuming grassroots, and very low level national league structure (step 5 and below if that means anything to you ) which is only where we use TDs here and whilst Comp rules mostly stipulate teamsheets and numbers, I think a temporary switch of numbers with ref informed would be permissible.Technically incorrect as it would have the wrong number (but probably fine at many levels).
I mean, given that's typically the approach taken in the PL on the occasions an outfield player has to go in goal, I think it would be excessively pedantic to insist it's not an acceptable approach at our levels!Yes. I was assuming grassroots, and very low level national league structure (step 5 and below if that means anything to you ) which is only where we use TDs here and whilst Comp rules mostly stipulate teamsheets and numbers, I think a temporary switch of numbers with ref informed would be permissible.
I think it’s a tough lesson for him to learn - but absolutely bang on the money. If he isn’t appropriately punished for it now, then he won’t learn…
Afraid I do disagree with you here. Although it is flippant and yes a YC (SB) could have possibly sufficed, however, the player clearly didn't say it as a knee-jerk reactive comment, he had time to think about it and made the comment. If in the opinion of the referee that is offensive, insulting or abusive, then the referee has every right to dismiss them from the field of play. Irrespective of the age, the laws are the same. I would, however, make sure I explain to the player why it is a red card. It doesn't matter if they use the 'cheat' adjective, the meaning and intention of the comment is still the same. The player could have simply asked about decisions, instead of making an accusatory comment such as that.As footballing referees we are not punishers. Not life coaches nor moral guardian
the comments are flippant, not, foul, abusive, insulting, offensive, whatever this months key word is.
no more severe than, cummon ref your having a laugh
Afraid I do disagree with you here. Although it is flippant and yes a YC (SB) could have possibly sufficed, however, the player clearly didn't say it as a knee-jerk reactive comment, he had time to think about it and made the comment. If in the opinion of the referee that is offensive, insulting or abusive, then the referee has every right to dismiss them from the field of play. Irrespective of the age, the laws are the same. I would, however, make sure I explain to the player why it is a red card. It doesn't matter if they use the 'cheat' adjective, the meaning and intention of the comment is still the same. The player could have simply asked about decisions, instead of making an accusatory comment such as that.
Afraid I disagree with you. But that’s fine.As you rightly say, the laws apply to all ages, and you are perfrctly entitled to red card an adult for " how much are they paying you ref", if that offfends you.
as long as " two teams on the park ref", is also a red, as that implies favouring one team over the other too.....
so does " you are giving them everything"
all implying you are cheating.
or, maybe they are indeed just situations were we use our personality, if we can find it amongst the clouds
Afraid I disagree with you. But that’s fine.
Personally, I don't see all 3 statements you originally listed as the same. In fact, each one is less offensive to the previous.so, you are sending off an adult for " you are giving them everything ref"
hopefully, because unless am missing something, it means the same as " how much are they paying you ref"
both imply bias, cheating, favouring one side over the other, questioning your integrity