PinnerPaul
RefChat Addict
Am I being thick, but if we're going to 55 - 60' of actual play, as no doubt someone will say the poor loves can't possibly actually play for 90', then games with a stop/start clock will last as long as they do now.There are a few I can think of
With a stop clock there is no telling how long a game would last. Broadcasting nightmare and that's where a lot of the money comes from.
It also presents travel issues - a game goes on much longer than 90 minutes due to the stopped clock then fans would potentially be stranded. The risk would lead to lower attendances and a lower quality of product = Less money.
Teams would take advantage and use stopped clock to punctuate the game further.
I feel a stop clock could potentially lead to a muc slower game and even American football based 'plays'. (Don't know a lot about it).
Of course there are things that can be done to combat but I wouldn't say there are no disadvantages that's for sure.
TV can cope, they don't know how much added time there is going to be now. For Cup games they have 3 schedules or running orders - 1 for 90" , 1 for 90' + ET and 1 for ET plus pens.