I'm pretty sure it's already been pointed out that this is the normal and perfectly standard suspension for a misapplication of the law. It's not as if they said, "Wow, this is such an egregious offence that we have to make an example and give him an extra-long suspension," it was just the standard punishment.
It's also been pointed out that this wasn't an isolated incident, he had done this several times before and it was also reported in this case that people had offered to lend him a coin and he refused.
Based on the way this was initially reported, I had felt like many that this referee had been a little hard done by but the more I read about it, the less sympathy I have for him, I'm afraid.