SM
The avuncular one
Don't disagree Declan. It should happen.
I also think teams and players can be biased idiots. Decisions are not always clear cut, lots of grey areas. You don't like a decision a ref gives against you? Be a man and get on with the game, don't winge like a little baby.
I also think that teams featuring "referees" are 99% (made up stats alert) tossers who have perhaps seen the law book and think they know how to referee. 99% of them are wrong. 98% of those don't keep up with law changes and make up laws as they go along (made up stat alert again) to suit their situation. Grey areas. Lots of greys areas in interpretation of the LOTG. The referee referees the game. If you are indeed a referee you know that!
I have Never come across a "referee" playing football who isn't taking huge liberties with the LOTG to support their argument. Nice and simple response. "If you are a referee you know law 5. You also know that arguing a decision with the referee is dissent. Let's get on with the game eh?"
Is @Hadit wrong about his perception of the game? Who knows. Is him coming here moaning wrong? Damn right it is. That's not how I believe refchat rolls. Supportive community of referees.
My opinion, not necessarily that of refchat.
I also think teams and players can be biased idiots. Decisions are not always clear cut, lots of grey areas. You don't like a decision a ref gives against you? Be a man and get on with the game, don't winge like a little baby.
I also think that teams featuring "referees" are 99% (made up stats alert) tossers who have perhaps seen the law book and think they know how to referee. 99% of them are wrong. 98% of those don't keep up with law changes and make up laws as they go along (made up stat alert again) to suit their situation. Grey areas. Lots of greys areas in interpretation of the LOTG. The referee referees the game. If you are indeed a referee you know that!
I have Never come across a "referee" playing football who isn't taking huge liberties with the LOTG to support their argument. Nice and simple response. "If you are a referee you know law 5. You also know that arguing a decision with the referee is dissent. Let's get on with the game eh?"
Is @Hadit wrong about his perception of the game? Who knows. Is him coming here moaning wrong? Damn right it is. That's not how I believe refchat rolls. Supportive community of referees.
My opinion, not necessarily that of refchat.
Last edited: