I've lost count of how many emails I've sent him this week! He's probably had enough of me by now! Just though I'd see if anyone knew.Why don’t you ask your RDO ? I can’t see that anyone would be better placed than them to advise
Well why don't you phone him then?I've lost count of how many emails I've sent him this week! He's probably had enough of me by now! Just though I'd see if anyone knew.
Hehe I'm sure he'd love thatWell why don't you phone him then?
If someone was sending me a lot of emails, then a phone call would probably be better as cumulative amount of time spent would be significantly less...Hehe I'm sure he'd love that
Exactly that. With the new system some counties just seem to have the RDO making the decision, but others still have promotion committees and dates will have been set for these, and will be different for each county. The end of progression periods are the end of October, December, February and April so I would say you would expect to be notified in the days or weeks following those dates.If someone was sending me a lot of emails, then a phone call would probably be better as cumulative amount of time spent would be significantly less...
So yes, I am sure he would love it, it you think he is going to be annoyed at the number of emails you've been sending him
In reality, and to back up @Keeday point, only he and a very few number of people are going to know the answer,.as there will be a meeting of some committee that will be scheduled for a specific date which will be the earliest date any decisions are made and then that meeting will determine when those decisions will be communicated.
Question: why do you need to know when the answers will be released? What's the point of asking?Hehe I'm sure he'd love that
Correct, there are no marks, but that doesn't mean anyone meeting the eligibility criteria gets promoted. Take an example where a referee has a report full of focus for development, there is no way they should be promoted. The difference is they don't need to wait a whole season to try again, now they can be considered again a couple of months later.If it's promotion to 6 or 5 it can't be before 30th April. Most CFAs will tell you within a week of that. Most of them don't use committees to decide promotions at that level any more, promotion is more or less automatic once the criteria are reached. Remember there's no marks.
Correct, there are no marks, but that doesn't mean anyone meeting the eligibility criteria gets promoted.
I can assure you it is the process.In practice this is exactly what it means. I've been told unofficially that the FA refereeing dept might be open to discussing failing a candidate if the CFA presents a case but there is no formal or official process for not promoting somebody who meets the criteria. That was basically the whole point of dropping the marks - make it easier to go from 7->6->5. Counties now have to keep a promotion tracker spreadsheet up to date so the FA can see exactly who has done what.
You might think a referee who is, according to his or her MDCs, nowhere near ready for the next level should not be promoted, and I might agree with you, but that's not the process, or at least not officially.
Yes, this was fed back to the FA when the plan first came out, as in how can we decide who to promote without a mark, and did it mean that everyone should be promoted. They conceded that this was a valid point, and CFAs can hold people back who have met the eligibility criteria but have worrying trends in their match day reports.I can assure you it is the process.
My County FA simply will not promote a referee 7-6 or 6-5 for whom both MDC reports are littered with "Development Points" especially if they're repeat points.
I'd hope that would be how all others operate as well, otherwise what's the point?
I can assure you it is the process.
Well we are on that system, and at least 4 haven't been promoted. But they don't fail, they just roll onto the next period.I write web application software which 16 CFAs use to administer their promotion schemes. Among those CFAs there have been 1748 promotions started. 34 candidates have withdrawn. 306 have been promoted.
Guess how many have failed.
Well we are on that system, and at least 4 haven't been promoted. But they don't fail, they just roll onto the next period.
They try again. Same criteria, same or different matchday coaches.Presumably they must eventually either pass, fail, or withdraw? How do you decide whether to promote them at the end of the following period, do you send more coaches out?
No, if they aren't promoted they just stay at the same level and the CFA try to get them another two match day reports. Using an example, if a 7 to 6 candidate isn't promoted at the end of October then can have another two reports and then be considered at the end of December. That's no different to how the old system was, previously if you failed 7 to 6 you automatically rolled onto the next season's 7 to 6. If you passed 7 to 6 you automatically rolled onto the next season's 6 to 5, although in both cases you could obviously choose to opt out.Presumably they must eventually either pass, fail, or withdraw? How do you decide whether to promote them at the end of the following period, do you send more coaches out?
Automatically promoting people for refereeing 25 games, attending a seminar and passing an exam would be ridiculous.