Runner Ref
RefChat Addict
Correct end result after the VAR intervention. But further proof that they aren’t very good at identifying SFP
Help keep RefChat running, any donation would be appreciated
This referee speaking to the crowd adds nothing for me, barely heard some of what Simon Hooper has said, just show the red card if that is your decision.
I don't think that was easy to see real time, it happened so quickly. You've then got the lack of reaction from Van Dijk, he was even having a smile with Gordon as he showed him the stud marks. The give away was the sock getting peeled down his leg, but I'll be big enough to admit I didn't see that until the replay, original thought was it was one of those typical challenges where the striker goes to block the ball and gets there late.
Disagree, yes he is going to get an incorrect KMD for the missed red card but I'm not convinced many, if any, referees (from any country) would see that real time. It was a very difficult game, Newcastle in particular came out extremely physical and if he'd gone wading in with yellow cards early on he'd have killed it as a spectacle. There were 21 fouls committed in the first half alone, I can't ever remember seeing that many in a half, you often don't get that many in a full gameLiverpool weren’t very good by any stretch and were very lucky. But thought Hooper was poor tonight. Foul recognition all over the show. Missed the SFP. Lost count of how many times he delayed a corner being taken to talk to people.
He was extremely inconsistent with his foul recognition. The constant delays at corners for him to earn players just started to frustrate everyone. Give them a warning, then take action. Don’t warn them over and over.Disagree, yes he is going to get an incorrect KMD for the missed red card but I'm not convinced many, if any, referees (from any country) would see that real time. It was a very difficult game, Newcastle in particular came out extremely physical and if he'd gone wading in with yellow cards early on he'd have killed it as a spectacle. There were 21 fouls committed in the first half alone, I can't ever remember seeing that many in a half, you often don't get that many in a full game
And it was just that, a spectacle, one of the best Premier League games I've seen in a long time. He wasn't perfect by any stretch, but certainly don't think he was poor.
That comes down to guidance they are given though, they are told to hold the restart to warn. I don't agree with it, but every PGMOL referee does it. I watched Sam Allison waste at least 5 minutes doing it last season, and whilst that was the worst even the elite referees do it.He was extremely inconsistent with his foul recognition. The constant delays at corners for him to earn players just started to frustrate everyone. Give them a warning, then take action. Don’t warn them over and over.
I’m not convinced that they are given guidance to delay restarts over and over to warn players over the same stuff. And if it is, it’s extremely poor guidance.That comes down to guidance they are given though, they are told to hold the restart to warn. I don't agree with it, but every PGMOL referee does it. I watched Sam Allison waste at least 5 minutes doing it last season, and whilst that was the worst even the elite referees do it.
Don't agree on his foul detection, he started off letting a lot go and then when he realised it was too heated he started cracking down on everything. That's almost textbook refereeing, changing your involvement based on the temperature of the game and at levels where you are observed is likely to earn kudos for match control.
Conversely, give a yellow card when the Liverpool player is kicked in the head within 5 minutes and maybe you find the players respond and it ends up a more controlled game? He often pitches it too tolerant for my liking, and I think in future this game will be the case study for why I don't like starting games with an intent to be lenient.Disagree, yes he is going to get an incorrect KMD for the missed red card but I'm not convinced many, if any, referees (from any country) would see that real time. It was a very difficult game, Newcastle in particular came out extremely physical and if he'd gone wading in with yellow cards early on he'd have killed it as a spectacle. There were 21 fouls committed in the first half alone, I can't ever remember seeing that many in a half, you often don't get that many in a full game
And it was just that, a spectacle, one of the best Premier League games I've seen in a long time. He wasn't perfect by any stretch, but certainly don't think he was poor.
If it isn't guidance why do they all do it? Even Oliver and Taylor who are elite FIFA referees?I’m not convinced that they are given guidance to delay restarts over and over to warn players over the same stuff. And if it is, it’s extremely poor guidance.
Don’t agree on the fouls. And I don’t think top flight officials should be missing SFP like that. We literally had this conversation on another thread earlier today and yesterday.
And that’s fair enough - some will and some won’t. Some will base it on their experience and some may just be down to how they always do their games - no initial right or wrong, but all depends what the outcome is - control or lack of control.Conversely, give a yellow card when the Liverpool player is kicked in the head within 5 minutes and maybe you find the players respond and it ends up a more controlled game? He often pitches it too tolerant for my liking, and I think in future this game will be the case study for why I don't like starting games with an intent to be lenient.
I’ve never ever seen them do it anywhere as near as much as Hooper did tonight. There’s no benefit, only frustration for people as it delays the restart. People want the game flowingIf it isn't guidance why do they all do it? Even Oliver and Taylor who are elite FIFA referees?
Can you translate this for me please.On the replay in real time