Russell Jones
RefChat Addict
If the ball hits the referee in one of the penalty areas, then is this automatically a drop ball to the defending GK or is it theoretically possible (in law) for the game to continue?
Eh? It days if ball goes directly into the goal its a dropped ball, that's what the law says?And off course the anomaly of going out of play by going directly into goal rebounding of the ref in which case we all accept its a dropped ball but according to the wording of the law its a goal.
i had a brain fart moment.Eh? It days if ball goes directly into the goal its a dropped ball, that's what the law says?
We all have them. Better here than on the field of playi had a brain fart moment.
Cheers for all your great responses. So, is this a correct summing up for the possible options when the referee is hit by the ball in a penalty area?:
Ball goes in the goal or a promising attack is started or possession changes : Dropped Ball. In all cases the DB is to the defending GK
Ball goes out of play: Restart is as it would have been if the ball had not hit the referee
In reality, I can't picture a credible situation where the ball stays in play and yet possession doesn't change or a promising attack started .. but in law, it sounds like play on is theoretically possible
Yup, good thoughts. Though even in these cases, if the referee is still in the area, then likely attackers are also there or thereabouts so it'd be a brave / foolish call to play on!Its prob never going to happen but at a stretch, a short goal kick, maybe taken quickly with ref still in pen area and rolls to its intended full back target, or even less likely, gk taking goal kick and it hits ref whilst he is still in pen area and bounces back to gk?
Yup, good thoughts. Though even in these cases, if the referee is still in the area, then likely attackers are also there or thereabouts so it'd be a brave / foolish call to play on!
Could the GK pick the ball up in the case where it has hit the referee?! And, if not, can you imagine the s**tstorm if you gave an IFK against
them?
Nope as it hasn't been played by another player.Yup, good thoughts. Though even in these cases, if the referee is still in the area, then likely attackers are also there or thereabouts so it'd be a brave / foolish call to play on!
Could the GK pick the ball up in the case where it has hit the referee?! And, if not, can you imagine the s**tstorm if you gave an IFK against
them?
For me, it's going to have to be very clear possession by defender to not just give a DB on this--I'll be more focused on SOTG than letter of the law here. (Which I think is consistent with how we've see these calls in professional games.)A likely scenario is in general play by a defender, hits ref and goes to another defender. It should be play on. Tough one if it goes from an easy possession or clearance to a under pressure possession.
That isn't what is taught, at least certainly not in Englan. It is expected that, when the need arises the referee follows the play into the PA.Even more reason not to enter the PA during an attack!
Yes, absolutely. The competency I've prospered from the most in my 5-to-4 observations, has been 'enthusiastically penetrating the box'That isn't what is taught, at least certainly not in Englan. It is expected that, when the need arises the referee follows the play into the PA.
You just have to be smart about where in the PA you go, hanging around on the penalty spot will do you know favours but coming on from the outer quarters of the PA should be relatively harmless and might just give you the angle you need for that KMD
And I'm sure you get plenty of satisfaction out of it.Yes, absolutely. The competency I've prospered from the most in my 5-to-4 observations, has been 'enthusiastically penetrating the box'
Did snortlaugh at an observer suggesting a colleague "hovers near the D" in a changing room once. 32 going on 12.Yes, absolutely. The competency I've prospered from the most in my 5-to-4 observations, has been 'enthusiastically penetrating the box'