Lol given what else he got, I didnt notice that as you said he got a little bit on the ball also!Got the ball.
Interesting. Because he more or less missed the ball it ends up hugely dangerous and therefore should have been red (IMO). But I can well imagine, if he'd met the ball square on then all would have been well and they'd have played on without incident ....
Well, except for the fact that the Livingstone player did get the ball and the ref simply cannot have seen the whole incident clearly hence his whistle and the yellow card. The easier decision there, given the reaction of the Hearts players, the crowd uproar and the time he had to think about it would have been a red card so I certainly don't think you can accuse the ref of bottling it.There's no possible way the ball could have been hit there. Ball was at the player's feet.
The other player wasn't between the ref and the incident, and I can't imagine how the ref didn't see this.
There's a bad tackle, then there's criminal assault. This is the latter.
The whistle use was terrible as well - his whistle said 'it's 50-50, but fine, I might give a foul for it'. It wasn't a 'yellow card' whistle. Referee didn't show that he took it seriously at all. Not to mention a horrendously wrong decision.
SM edit . UNNECESSARYThe ref was from the Bstard school of officialdom ( hogwarts to you and me)
The comment was not written to "bait" said Mr Bstard but in jest based on his first post, unfortunatley not taken in the humour intended.............