Nope, think it's you missed my point.You may have missed the word 'general'
Recklessness is not general Unsporting behaviour. It is Unsporting behaviour.
Nope, think it's you missed my point.You may have missed the word 'general'
I gather we're on the same page then. It is a specific mandatory category, rather than a discretionary matter. It doesn't form part of an exhaustive list of USBNope, think it's you missed my point.
Recklessness is not general Unsporting behaviour. It is Unsporting behaviour.
Fine, choose not to fixate on the word launching. You're still describing a tackle that is reckless. You've still failed to provide an alternative that doesn't tick either reckless or SPA yet still requires a card.You also snuck the word 'launching' in there. You're overblowing the scenario to suit your case. It suggests you don't wish to take the exercise on in a genuine way because you are concerned it will undermine your position.
USB is an 'I'll know it when I see it' type of offence. We've discussed blatant holding on here many times. It's a concept to which Ryantheref is alluding. It's not unfamiliar and the pile on against what he has said has been unnecessary and, frankly, disingenuous.
Konate - not a yellow
Holding which is not SPA or reckless - possibly yellow depending on the circumstances