Rusty called it blunt. I would call it sarcastic and belittling. If it's a response to those of us on this forum for a long time, we take it as banter, give as good as we take and create more work for the mods. But for a new ref, or even an experienced one but new to this forum, it means, well, that the end of this forum for me.
A site moderator can pass comment, a random poster cannot, I personally find some of your posts to be xxxxxxxxxxxx however I don't go as far as to reveal that publically.
There was nothing sarcastic or belittling from my end, the word to describe what I typed is as I said, "blunt"
If I need or want your opinion on the tone of my posts, I will either ask for it, or, refer to you a site moderator. (of which you are not)
Far more interesting, and less personal, is, that, the more "helpful" replies since, all quote the same things I already posted....all along the lines, of, say nothing/bare polite minimum,
If it helps the new referee further, I will throw in something not mentioned yet, unless its happened unbeknown to me, at the very top level, there is no pre match talk where I am.
Further still, given this forum does not cover every referee of all time ever, I would say its 50/50 as to whether a kit inspection/boot check etc takes place at games at all.
even small talk is prob best avoided , something as innocent as "hows the season going", or "how did you get on last week", will usually result in them turning it into a ref rant about how they would have won the last 6 games but for dodgy pens and offsides
I have experienced it work the other way too, I did a league decider years back in area I don't normally referee, and turned out the manager of one of the teams was someone I had known for xx years, so, strolling about the park pre match we did have a chat, few mins into game, manager is using my name instead of "ref" and the other team began to think something was amiss.
suppose can only try and test what works best