Problem with that first bullet point is if a shot hit their hand when it is tucked in by their side it would be a penalty, even if from point blank range.I think I’ve simplified it - at least as codified law. Still room for interpretation/ in the opinion of the referee but here goes:
Handball is punished by a direct free kick or penalty kick if in a player’s own penalty area (except for the goalkeeper in their own penalty area) if a player uses their hand or arm to:
- Block or attempt to block a shot at goal by an opponent (unless the ball enters the goal in which case a goal is awarded).
- Prevent an opponent gaining or retaining possession of the ball.
- Gains, retains, or attempts to gain or retain possession of the ball.
- Prevents or attempts to prevent the ball going out of play.
A direct free kick is also awarded if a player scores or attempts to score in the opponents goal after the ball has touched their hand or arm.
No natural/unnatural positions, or any of the other big question marks. Also eliminates the “kick it at a players arm” argument.
Of course there will still be debate over decisions, but ultimately it cuts the grey areas down to a binary choice. Did that action do one of the above? Yes or no?
Perhaps we should work together to come up with a RefChat workable handball law then send it to IFAB. I'm not sure we could create anything worse than the complete mess they've come up with over the past few seasons.