I am happy to accept the Bristol City example as a challenge on the goalkeeper while he releases it, so it's the correct decision. There have been instances where the goalkeeper is at fault, however. Posts on this topic in the past have suggested that if a goalkeeper was prevented from releasing it just by virtue of a close opponent, an IFK should be awarded. Moreover, another post claimed that dangerous play was the reason for this sanction by another name. These are not my interpretations; I am responding to ideas posited by other referees on a situation that can be thorny.