one
RefChat Addict
This topic has had many threads here. Biggest one being in a UCL final between Real Madrid and Liverpool when one of the goals came of a similar incident.
Let's say the keeper is about to release or roll the ball to a teammate 20 yards away. An opponent deliberately runs very close and directly in the path. The keeper then move 2 yards to the side and takes different release options a seconds later. Many argue here that because the keeper release the ball, the opponent did not prevent the keeper releasing so there is no offence. Not the case. The offence took place a seconds earlier than the release. The reason we don't stop the game is as @socal lurker mentioned, not to give the culprit the satisfaction. If the second option release is intercepted, I will definitely bring the ball back for an IFK for preventing keeper from releasing a few seconds earlier.
Generally this won't be a caution but if it was, it won't be for preventing keeper to release, it would be for some other USB reason.
Lastly, how close an opponent can be for it to be considered preventing release rather than just an intercept is a grey area. So is if the act has to be a deliberate act.
Understanding what "preventing the goalkeeper from releasing the ball" means is very important.Remember though, that the offence is in preventing the GK from releasing the ball. It's not just for "getting in the way" or even "putting the GK off". That might sound contradictory as such but there can be a fine line between them ...
Let's say the keeper is about to release or roll the ball to a teammate 20 yards away. An opponent deliberately runs very close and directly in the path. The keeper then move 2 yards to the side and takes different release options a seconds later. Many argue here that because the keeper release the ball, the opponent did not prevent the keeper releasing so there is no offence. Not the case. The offence took place a seconds earlier than the release. The reason we don't stop the game is as @socal lurker mentioned, not to give the culprit the satisfaction. If the second option release is intercepted, I will definitely bring the ball back for an IFK for preventing keeper from releasing a few seconds earlier.
Generally this won't be a caution but if it was, it won't be for preventing keeper to release, it would be for some other USB reason.
Lastly, how close an opponent can be for it to be considered preventing release rather than just an intercept is a grey area. So is if the act has to be a deliberate act.