ladbroke8745
RefChat Addict
Why are these never spotted (once in every other blue moon) in professional football...
View attachment VID-20240829-WA0000.mp4
View attachment VID-20240829-WA0000.mp4
Back foot looks clearly up to me up and this is one frame before releasing it.This is not a foul throw. The foot comes up after the ball is released/thrown.
The law only requires the 3 provisions for a correct throw in to be "at the moment of delivering the ball" so any secondary lifting of the feet, as in this clip, is permissible.
There is no way you can accurately tell from that blurry still.
I think his toes are still on the ground there. Either way, at that level of football if you're calling a foul throw it has to be pretty clear!
That throw looks so bad it has to be called for poor entertainment.I think his toes are still on the ground there. Either way, at that level of football if you're calling a foul throw it has to be pretty clear!
Next frame, laws of physics, biomechanics and geometry don't just add up if his back foot is touching the ground. Front leg on his toes straight and leaning forward. Back leg can't be touching the ground unless it's two feet longer than the front leg. Yeah I know, ARs at that level don't make mistakes.There is no way you can accurately tell from that blurry still.
Like I said, the AR had a much better view of it than we do and was happy with it ...
You don't moonlight as a VAR by any chance... no?Back foot looks clearly up to me up and this is one frame before releasing it
Still can't tell. Only presume.Next frame, laws of physics, biomechanics and geometry don't just add up if his back foot is touching the ground. Front leg on his toes straight and leaning forward. Back leg can't be touching the ground unless it's two feet longer than the front leg. Yeah I know, ARs at that level don't make mistakes.
View attachment 7518