Anubis
RefChat Addict
There's one common denominator in play here
Positioning for the drop zone being too perfect!
There's one common denominator in play here
I attempted it in a charity match I did. Went closer to the corner flag than the goal, I wonder why I took up refereeingSure we've all been there on the edge of the box when the ball just drops perfectly and you think "I could smash this into the top corner".
One of the downsides of the throw in restart is that most in the game expect a dropped ball for it hitting the referee. 99.9% of the time the ball will stay on the field of play and perhaps meet one of the three conditions so its a DB. Personally I think it somewhat "unfair" that if it hits the referee and stays on the field of play and changes possession it is a DB whereas in the exact same situation if it is kept in play on the touchline by an opponent it is a DB. If he let it go out he gets a TI and possession. This once happened to me and I went with the DB with zero complaint from opponents. Everyone fully expected the DB so rather than getting caught up in a LotG debate it was the easier call in the game. Try explaining to a team where a pass has been deflected out of play off the referee for a TI and the opponents take it quickly, mounting a quick attack.
Yet trying to explain the finer points of law in a game does not work too easily. IFAB needs to tidy that one up to allow the referee to make a decision within the ‘spirit’ of the game and the Laws. To use that phrase, “what would football want/expect?”
On one hand I agree, but on the other that can be quite a can of worms as in many cases there can be clear differences of opinion, and it puts the referee on the spot. And it is contrary to the direction IFAB has been going in recent years with more and more specificity in the name of consistency. It seems that every change IFAB makes is to reduce referee discretion and judgment. While I’d like to go back to when ITOOTR was a stronger concept, that isn’t the way the tide is going..
Yet trying to explain the finer points of law in a game does not work too easily. IFAB needs to tidy that one up to allow the referee to make a decision within the ‘spirit’ of the game and the Laws. To use that phrase, “what would football want/expect?”
Outcome of ball hiring the referee can get a little complex with many edge case scenarios. The problem with going with what does football expect is that when something new comes about, there is no expectation set. Then football expects what they see or hear as they watch games. So if enough of us referees get a law wrong, then that wrong outcome would becomes what football expects. And if we all get it consistently right (according to law) then that is what they would expect.Yet trying to explain the finer points of law in a game does not work too easily. IFAB needs to tidy that one up to allow the referee to make a decision within the ‘spirit’ of the game and the Laws. To use that phrase, “what would football want/expect?”
Agreed, I'm giving a DB if it's in my interests to do so. Like giving offside in against a team in their defensive halfI alluded to that. it happened to me, i went ( correctly) throw.
I maybe got a bit lucky in that, I knew both teams well, and, nothing came from the throw, but even a civilised chat post match, the coach was not buying it.
everyone expected drop ball. Next time, am blowing before the ball goes out if play!
I'll bear that in mind when I go for promotion next season!Harder to score highly in assessments in games without mayhem)
Although they have changed to law to meet the custom and practice of NEVER giving encroachment by the GK if the kick is missed (ie not saved)Outcome of ball hiring the referee can get a little complex with many edge case scenarios. The problem with going with what does football expect is that when something new comes about, there is no expectation set. Then football expects what they see or hear as they watch games. So if enough of us referees get a law wrong, then that wrong outcome would becomes what football expects. And if we all get it consistently right (according to law) then that is what they would expect.
To give you an example, keeper encroachment was not expected to be given for minor ones for many years (well because referees didn't give it). Then with VAR there was a lot of issues when small encroachment were given. After consistently applying it, now keepers have learnt to stay on the line and giving minor encroachment is not against expectation, even if in practice it has not helped the keeper make a save.
Note to self... Ball struck me the other night and went out for a Goal Kick. I gave the Goal KickAgreed, I'm giving a DB if it's in my interests to do so. Like giving offside in against a team in their defensive half
Both not worth the hassle, loss of respect and loss of MC. (Unless being observed, in which case the marks offset the mayhem... which ironically opens the door to more assessment marks via Sin Bins and such like. Harder to score highly in assessments in games without mayhem)