You can't choose whether or not to flag for an offside, that isn't the issue here. The issue is at what point he should have dropped the flag.The incident occurs in the 47th minute so there might have been direction of play confusion
More likely, the player was offside (or may have been offside in a close call)
The AR may have been encouraged to flag because there was an observer there. Point scoring for a 'clever offside' maybe?
It was not a foul because the R indicates an IDFK
If this was a tight call, it teaches me that the AR should have left it alone. The game usually doesn't expect these offsides and they can be very dangerous. The Referee should have removed the AR away from the TA's and taken more time to digest what had happened. All easy to say when armed with nothing more than a keyboard
Disaster
You can if you've learned from experience that some (rare) flags add nothing to the game whatsoever, are not expected.... and ultimately get you and the R into trouble. I know you'll disagree (strongly), but I don't careYou can't choose whether or not to flag for an offside, that isn't the issue here
I can understand aspects of this at contrib and the clip in itself backs your point. However, if not for this controversy, a competent observer would be able to reward an AR in similar situations,.You can if you've learned from experience that some (rare) flags add nothing to the game whatsoever, are not expected.... and ultimately get you and the R into trouble. I know you'll disagree (strongly), but I don't care
Although I would care (somewhat) if my games were video reviewed
The flag in the OP is not the absolute cause of the chaos, but it does trigger the debacle. Let's just say that I've learned not to 'point score' with the Observer as a L4, largely because my score counts for nowt
I'm just saying that if the forward is half a body, maybe a body offside, in this incident, without video review, the flag just hasn't been worth the pain. If the game doesn't expect the flag, the observer is very unlikely to notice at this level and we all go home happyI can understand aspects of this at contrib and the clip in itself backs your point. However, if not for this controversy, a competent observer would be able to reward an AR in similar situations,.
You can't possibly know that, at the time of the ball being played the camera is nowhere near the defensive line. He could be easily 2 metres offside for all we know.I'm just saying that if the forward is half a body, maybe a body offside, in this incident, without video review, the flag just hasn't been worth the pain. If the game doesn't expect the flag, the observer is very unlikely to notice at this level and we all go home happy
Clear offside is not the topic of debate. Very unlikely this incident fitted that bill. That said, I'd be amazed if this was 'clear offside' , although we can't know that definitivelyYou can't possibly know that, at the time of the ball being played the camera is nowhere near the defensive line. He could be easily 2 metres offside for all we know.
If I was observing at that level, and I happened to be sat close enough to the offside line, I'd be expecting the AR to do his job and flag it. Granted I'd then want that flag to be dropped as the attack developed, but the initial offside offence should be signalled.
Totally understand where you are coming from. However, with more and more games getting videoed, my advice when you are working as an AR is simply to do your job. If an attacker come back from an offside position and clearly plays / challenges for the ball or interferes with play then get your flag up unless an advantage is immediately apparent. Not only are you properly enforcing the LOTG but you're demonstrating alertness with regard to offside position and in 90+% of cases you then have the opportunity to demonstrate great signalling technique by working through the correct 'coming back' process.The incident occurs in the 47th minute so there might have been direction of play confusion
More likely, the player was offside (or may have been offside in a close call)
The AR may have been encouraged to flag because there was an observer there. Point scoring for a 'clever offside' maybe?
It was not a foul because the R indicates an IDFK
If this was a tight call, it teaches me that the AR should have left it alone. The game usually doesn't expect these offsides and they can be very dangerous. The Referee should have removed the AR away from the TA's and taken more time to digest what had happened. All easy to say when armed with nothing more than a keyboard
Disaster
Before signalling for an offence, the AR must determine that:unless an advantage is immediately apparent
Yes, I mean, this is what I'm referring to in terms of 'point scoring'. The AR is more focused on ticking boxes to pick up points, rather than what's good for the game. That can't be a good thing for the game itselfNot only are you properly enforcing the LOTG but you're demonstrating alertness with regard to offside position and in 90+% of cases you then have the opportunity to demonstrate great signalling technique by working through the correct 'coming back' process.
I'm 95% with you here. There's a sweet spot. There does become a point where the process is too long and even with a right decision it doesn't look/feel good.The big mistake in the OP is 'process'. The 'process' during which the R speaks to the AR. The conversation should not happen right in front of the TA and it clearly led to misunderstanding, the wrong outcome and further misconduct. The learning point we can all take away, is take your fr1g^!^$ time when consulting with colleagues. I'm certain we've all been very guilty of hurried exchanges. Why do we place emphasis on haste in these situations? It's a curious thing. I'm of a mind that we should take literally 'as long as it takes'
No, standard instructions are to keep the flag up until you are confident the defending team have an advantage. Probably gets discussed less in pre-match instructions these days as so many referees use buzzers, but I can't remember ever being given an instruction to keep the (missed) flag up ad infinitum.Everything I have ever been taught is that an AR should drop the OS flag if it is missed and the defending team gains clear possession and moves forward. Is anything different taught in England? (I can’t remember if that is in the magic book or not.)