..... Potentially....... He apologised to Wilder, there is nothing potentially about it.... Lets see that new law upgraded next season!!!Poor positioning.
Potentially, still frame doesn't provide much information.
..... Potentially....... He apologised to Wilder, there is nothing potentially about it.... Lets see that new law upgraded next season!!!Poor positioning.
Potentially, still frame doesn't provide much information.
Did he?..... Potentially....... He apologised to Wilder, there is nothing potentially about it.... Lets see that new law upgraded next season!!!
Did he?
Fair enough, all I've seen is still images, so it makes it hard to determine exactly what happened.Yes, Wilder praised him for it in his interview....
Statement of Fact, without reference thenNo, because there aren't any official ones, although I'm sure if you care enough you could make freedom of information requests to get details of any petitions made towards The FA about the introduction of VAR.
However, I'm sure if I cared enough to try I could find loads of post match interviews where managers are demanding VAR be introduced because they are fed up of refereeing mistakes.
I'd disagree. It was the direction of his movement that caused me concern not his initial position (but even then I thought he was too close). He moved across play into the area into which the ball was being played rather than away to the left to get a better angle. He invited contact and interference.
Statement of Fact, without reference then
I don't need evidence that you petitioned the FA. I'm quite sure you did. Not relevant anyway
Misread your post. Still, wouldn't have been a surprise to meWhat are you on about, I haven't petitioned The FA, why would I?
I wasn't arguing that the spirit of the game wasn't in the laws, I was arguing that if the referee felt the handball was intentional there was no need to use it.
Oh and I don't think it's a fandom thing to say that no top referee who wants to officiate in the top games is going to say they support one of the top clubs.
Mark Halsey supported QPR and after he gave Millwall two big decisions in a game against QPR he asked not to ref in their games again. But then QPR were never a top club...
I genuinely didn't know QPR's history or place in any list of the supposed 'big clubs' so I looked....Does finishing 2nd, 5th and 5th in the top league not count as being a top club? 1/4 finals of the UEFA Cup as well.
Can think of many 'top flight' clubs who haven't finished in the top 6 of the top league in many a long year nor reached latter stages of a European competition either.
As others have said this really isn't the forum for making cheap (inaccurate) shots about another club.
There was a poll in the papers last year (I think) and 4 out of 5 fans wanted VAR.
The power rests with the Premier League clubs, they voted in favour of its use, so I assume they can also vote to have it removed as it isn't a mandatory part of the laws.
Unless Gillingham get an away game against a Premier League club in either the FA Cup or the Carabao cup it's going to be a very long time before VAR ruins my Saturday afternoons.
I genuinely didn't know QPR's history or place in any list of the supposed 'big clubs' so I looked....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_football_clubs_in_England_by_competitive_honours_won
This season the fans are singing "F**k VAR".
2 years ago they were singing "The referees a W****r" and "You don't know what you're doing"
Fans wanted technology because they wanted 2 things:
1) The right decisions 100% of the time
2) Consistency, not just within the 90 minutes, but also across the season with different referees.
Technology is delivering those things, but it's proving to be at the cost of enjoyment of the game for those watching.
However, let's be clear, the real driver for getting decisions right, no matter how long it takes is money. Last season the difference between 8th and 10th in the Prem was almost £6m. Potentially in a tight season a VAR decision could impact final placings.
Then you have decisions that could impact whether clubs get into the CL or not, or at the other end drop out of the Prem entirely.
My view, VAR is here to stay, and will continue to be a source of contention, fans will continue to hate it, but football is protecting commercial interests above all else.
Some people don't realise or don't remember that football was a very different beast before the premier League and money bags owners came in.
Only 11 of the original 22 teams are still in the premier League, and only 9 of those have been there from the start with no relegations.
Totally agree, you say it more elegantly than me though.
My bad, I had to look it up and the article said 9, but was a couple of years old.A total of 49 clubs have played in the Premier League since its inception, with (6) Arsenal, Chelsea, Everton, Liverpool, Man Utd, and Spurs participating in every campaign to date.
There is a thing called 'The Law of Big Numbers'This season the fans are singing "F**k VAR".
2 years ago they were singing "The referees a W****r" and "You don't know what you're doing"
Fans wanted technology because they wanted 2 things:
1) The right decisions 100% of the time
2) Consistency, not just within the 90 minutes, but also across the season with different referees.
Technology is delivering those things, but it's proving to be at the cost of enjoyment of the game for those watching.
However, let's be clear, the real driver for getting decisions right, no matter how long it takes is money. Last season the difference between 8th and 10th in the Prem was almost £6m. Potentially in a tight season a VAR decision could impact final placings.
Then you have decisions that could impact whether clubs get into the CL or not, or at the other end drop out of the Prem entirely.
My view, VAR is here to stay, and will continue to be a source of contention, fans will continue to hate it, but football is protecting commercial interests above all else.