noAnyone agree with Padfoot on this???? ........
noAnyone agree with Padfoot on this???? ........
That's exactly what happened to Sulley Muntari in Italy when he walked off after receiving racist abuse from opposition supporters. So yes, there's a precedent already set for that example.I guess according to the very letter of the law we should also be carding an u15s player who walks off the pitch in protest after receiving abuse from the opposition's parents as he/she didn't have our permission to leave either!
What have precedents got to do with it? There are many precedents of players leaving a pitch without caution yet you would still card someone for doing it? Also, precedents can be errors within law so irrelevant when comes to football.That's exactly what happened to Sulley Muntari in Italy when he walked off after receiving racist abuse from opposition supporters. So yes, there's a precedent already set for that example.
I know I should not of laughed at this but you couldn't make it up I regulary see Liverpools defence go missing they might be off the FOP. Explains everything!yes, he cautioned the first 4 that came back on for doing so without permission and then duly abandoned the game.
I sat on a disciplinary hearing years ago after a game had been abandoned. The referee had sent a player off, and several team mates had walked off in protest. The referee cautioned all of them,
I thought that is why you were referring to it and I don't do research for others if you make errors in your statements it is you who looks foolish not me. I merely said that precedents can be wrong in law..as proved Sulley wasn't booked hence the precedent is set!But there's no error in law. You said yourself in post #75 of this thread that you agreed with @Padfoot inasmuch as the LOTG state it should be a mandatory caution. I also said I agreed with @Padfoot because of the very same thing.
The law might be an ass but it doesn't disguise the fact that a caution should be administered even though the majority here refuse to follow that sanction as described. It seems to me as though a lack of consistency in the application of this law is borne out by people's belief that it is unjust and against 'the spirit of the game'.
I've cautioned (and dismissed) a number of players who could be described as hard done by, but the laws left me with little choice.
And if you'd done a little research, you 'd also have noticed that I am probably wrong about the Sulley Muntari case as the more I looked into it, they more I realised he probably wasn't cautioned for 'leaving the field without permission'.