Recently, I refereed a game (U15) where I awarded a free kick 5 yards outside the box, near the "D." It took the attackers about 10 seconds to place the ball, and they were ready. I got into position, and as I blew the whistle, the defenders started saying, "Ref, we want a wall." However, they were all scattered about and werent even trying to form a wall.
just to be clear for this
1. whistled for free kick
2. Got to the spot
3. made sure the ball was placed correctly,
4. told attackers to wait for the whistle
5 i looked up there was no wall so I went got into position
6. then blew the whistle,
7. defenders then asked for wall
This led to a back-and-forth exchange:
Me: "I don’t see a wall."
Defenders: "You need to tell us where."
Me: "But you haven’t formed a wall."
Defenders: "You haven’t told us where."
And so on. This eventually led to some dissent.
I have always allowed quick free kicks unless I’ve interfered in some way (e.g., I have pulled a defender out of position, or I’ve slowed the restart to manage an injury), or the attackers have asked for the wall to be managed. At the first opportunity I get in a game, if defenders ask for a wall, I say loudly for everyone to hear:
"Guys, if you want a wall, first form it, then I will march it out, because if the attackers take it quick, I ain’t stopping them."
I operate with the philosophy that, in any free kick resulting from a foul, the attacking team should not be disadvantaged since they are the ones who have been unfairly fouled.
What are your thoughts on this? is this contrary to what most people do? what does football expect (as IFAB puts it)
just to be clear for this
1. whistled for free kick
2. Got to the spot
3. made sure the ball was placed correctly,
4. told attackers to wait for the whistle
5 i looked up there was no wall so I went got into position
6. then blew the whistle,
7. defenders then asked for wall
This led to a back-and-forth exchange:
Me: "I don’t see a wall."
Defenders: "You need to tell us where."
Me: "But you haven’t formed a wall."
Defenders: "You haven’t told us where."
And so on. This eventually led to some dissent.
I have always allowed quick free kicks unless I’ve interfered in some way (e.g., I have pulled a defender out of position, or I’ve slowed the restart to manage an injury), or the attackers have asked for the wall to be managed. At the first opportunity I get in a game, if defenders ask for a wall, I say loudly for everyone to hear:
"Guys, if you want a wall, first form it, then I will march it out, because if the attackers take it quick, I ain’t stopping them."
I operate with the philosophy that, in any free kick resulting from a foul, the attacking team should not be disadvantaged since they are the ones who have been unfairly fouled.
What are your thoughts on this? is this contrary to what most people do? what does football expect (as IFAB puts it)