You're kidding right? Then maybe Pardew got off lightly tooHow on earth is it let off lightly?
Pardew got 2 matches for a push on an AR......Wenger gets double that......and a bigger fine.
You're kidding right? Then maybe Pardew got off lightly too
This is a disgraceful sentence - but about the length we expected. No support for referees. Should have been 6-8 months, minimum.
But how often do we see players push referees and get away with it? A lot, under the guise of 'manhandling' (which would also be an immediate dismissal and long suspension in just about any other sport).
This sport could barely encourage refereeing abuse and assault more if it tried.
We are surely not talking about assault guys, it was a bad thing to do but lets keep a little shove in perspective...it seems he got 2 games for the push and 2 games for using the C word with moss - seems about right to me. Different if he drop kicked him or punched him - i.e. Assault.
Que the "set an example" responses but "6-8 months minimum" for a shove would be ridiculous.
They've had chance to be respectful but they can't help themselves, you never hear them slagging off their own players for that missed open goal. When the rule is STFU then thats what they should do... Refs have seen it for a fraction of a second, made a decision, right or wrong, they've had multiple views and briefings... Its not a mistake, its an error of judgement..... big difference... The assessor has the opportunity to comment and act accordingly if too much goes wrong!!! Far too much emotion after a game for a rational response not based on the result!!While I agree with the ban and fine in this incident. I do think that they protect the refs a little to much in the sense that Managers can not complain if they think the ref has had a bad game. Insulting them I agree should be stopped, but saying that they think that the ref has been bad, what's wrong with that.
So if Mr A Manager comes out to speak to BBC/Sky/BT etc and says Mr D Fender or Mr Mid Fielder (or even Mr S Triker) did X, Y or Z wrong and had a poor game and then says "but I also feel Mr Referee got this, this & that wrong and he's not been good enough", then it's ok?They've had chance to be respectful but they can't help themselves, you never hear them slagging off their own players for that missed open goal. When the rule is STFU then thats what they should do... Refs have seen it for a fraction of a second, made a decision, right or wrong, they've had multiple views and briefings... Its not a mistake, its an error of judgement..... big difference... The assessor has the opportunity to comment and act accordingly if too much goes wrong!!! Far too much emotion after a game for a rational response not based on the result!!
How on earth is it let off lightly?
Pardew got 2 matches for a push on an AR......Wenger gets double that......and a bigger fine.
I'm not sure that managers are prohibited from complaining about referees - or if they are, it certainly doesn't seem to stop them. I do believe that when a manager complains about a ref in a post-match interview, they are usually giving an emotional, biased and often incorrect opinion which is heavily influenced by whether the game didn't go the way they wanted (it's very rarely the winning manager that says anything). What is not allowed (or at least, will almost always lead to charges) is for them to imply that the referee has not acted impartially.While I agree with the ban and fine in this incident. I do think that they protect the refs a little to much in the sense that Managers can not complain if they think the ref has had a bad game. Insulting them I agree should be stopped, but saying that they think that the ref has been bad, what's wrong with that.