Help keep RefChat running, any donation would be appreciated
I think it is different because the tackler is less in control of the action as a result of leaving the ground, although the contact itself isn’t dissimilar.This may be stupid, and not saying its not red, but how is this any different to the MLS one from few weeks back?
Not even close to being similar. He's lunging, off the ground, gone over the top of the ball, and there is far more than glancing contact half way up the shin.This may be stupid, and not saying its not red, but how is this any different to the MLS one from few weeks back?
Answers on a postcard please boys and girls!
This is where there should be two tiers of SFP- one match ban and 3. The argument is that it is up to the player to remain in control of their bodies - but also this argument works for both sides, as sometimes unfortunate things happen.Well the MOTD pundits perhaps unsurprisingly disagree with this being a red card and in fairness to Shearer I do see his point that the point of contact from the Bournemouth player is caused because hia foot slipped from contact with the ball.
I'm in two minds with this because contact was high and the touch of the ball is of course irrelevant at times but there was not alot of force in the tackle and if Lewis Skelly finally got away with it then I think the Bournemouth player could count himself rather unfortunate.
Its ones of those where I think referees will understand more why this is SFP than fans and pundits will.
1 & 3 match bans don’t really have anything to do with it, as they are competition based. There would need to be a global agreement on this (which I doubt you would get)This is where there should be two tiers of SFP- one match ban and 3. The argument is that it is up to the player to remain in control of their bodies - but also this argument works for both sides, as sometimes unfortunate things happen.
Will be interested to hear more on this tomorrow on Ref Watch. I’m clearly far too biased.
Haha! It’s entertaining - not necessarily insightful.1 & 3 match bans don’t really have anything to do with it, as they are competition based. There would need to be a global agreement on this (which I doubt you would get)
You may well have just gone down in history as the only person ever to say they’re interested in what Ref Watch has to say![]()
For me a classic case of the ref waiting for VAR to bail him out.
I'm sure in a lot of cases the ref shows yellow and waits for the call to the screen. Cannot see the reverse happening.
We've done this topic over and over. If you think a referee does this, either consciously or subconsciously, then of course that's your opinion that you're entitled to believe, however I can tell you factually that if the referee gets it wrong on field it still goes against them as an incorrect KMI, so you'd think they'd rather try and get the decision correct first time than 'play it safe.'For me a classic case of the ref waiting for VAR to bail him out.
I'm sure in a lot of cases the ref shows yellow and waits for the call to the screen. Cannot see the reverse happening.
We've done this topic over and over. If you think a referee does this, either consciously or subconsciously, then of course that's your opinion that you're entitled to believe, however I can tell you factually that if the referee gets it wrong on field it still goes against them as an incorrect KMI, so you'd think they'd rather try and get the decision correct first time than 'play it safe.'