I know that is definitely true in my case!We're not all as good as he *thinks he is
I know that is definitely true in my case!We're not all as good as he *thinks he is
While that would morally be the right, it's not exactly in keeping with lotg or var protocolDid he show leniency on the second YC for TAA as they had some further discussion that TAA had possibly been fouled in the lead up to his first YC?
I agree, but as Mike Dean confirmed this week, unfortunately, human nature could have come into play and as they realised he had possibly missed the lead up foul in the first incident, decided to make life easier for himself and take the lesser of two bad choices, resulting in him not opening himself up to a pile of criticism and front pages for the next week if he had gone YC/RC in the first 5mins.While that would morally be the right, it's not exactly in keeping with lotg or var protocol
You're right, and I bet we've all done similar in our own games, I know I haveI agree, but as Mike Dean confirmed this week, unfortunately, human nature could have come into play and as they realised he had possibly missed the lead up foul in the first incident, decided to make life easier for himself and take the lesser of two bad choices, resulting in him not opening himself up to a pile of criticism and front pages for the next week if he had gone YC/RC in the first 5mins.
I didn't say I'm able to put this theory into practice!Easy to say for you. Not all of us are as good as you are
Did he show leniency on the second YC for TAA as they had some further discussion that TAA had possibly been fouled in the lead up to his first YC?
Not DOGSO if you see the other angle only way covering defender doesn’t get across is if impeded himself I actually would of booked Isak looking at the angle shown on us tv shared on social media he throws himself before contact so textbook yellowHonestly can't believe the commentary about how that shouldn't have been a red for VVD as it was 'soft'.
That's a textbook DOGSO.
One thing I was disappointed with... Liverpool had 6 outfield players and the keeper protesting/surrounding the decision. No cautions given.
Not DOGSO if you see the other angle only way covering defender doesn’t get across is if impeded himself I actually would of booked Isak looking at the angle shown on us tv shared on social media he throws himself before contact so textbook yellow
With all due respect, neither of the points you have made here are accurate in the slightest.Not DOGSO if you see the other angle only way covering defender doesn’t get across is if impeded himself I actually would of booked Isak looking at the angle shown on us tv shared on social media he throws himself before contact so textbook yellow
And probably not as good as we think we are.We're not all as good as he *thinks he is
They are 100% accurate if you watch the footage.With all due respect, neither of the points you have made here are accurate in the slightest.
No they aren't, it was a clear foul and once he gave it red for DOGSO was the only possible outcome.They are 100% accurate if you watch the footage.
Not in my view and seems to be fairly split opinion on DOGSO even among refsNo they aren't, it was a clear foul and once he gave it red for DOGSO was the only possible outcome.
You're genuinely the first ref I know who's questioned itNot in my view and seems to be fairly split opinion on DOGSO even among refs
Don't seem to be that many on here that think it wasn't DOGSO. And by many I of course mean any, as you seem to be the only one that thinks it wasn't, and there's a least one Liverpool fan on here that thinks it was.Not in my view and seems to be fairly split opinion on DOGSO even among refs
You a Liverpool fan by any chance?Not in my view and seems to be fairly split opinion on DOGSO even among refs
Left hand side direct line so easily gets there thank you for proving my point.From Dale Johnsons review. An attacker running full speed at goal. No other defender is in position to stop the OGSO.
The VAR Review: Van Dijk red card, Manchester United penalty
In this week's VAR Review: Was it the correct decision to send off Liverpool defender Virgil van Dijk at Newcastle United? Was the VAR right not to intervene to cancel the penalty for Man United?www.espn.com
View attachment 6799