Can't be a PK because the Wolves player was murdered outside the FOP
Can't be a PK because the Wolves player was murdered outside the FOP
Check location of restart for offences outside of FOP.Can't be a PK because the Wolves player was murdered outside the FOP
I know, I was having a laugh! I've read your posts for the last 4 years so I'm hardly likely to get that wrongCheck location of restart for offences outside of FOP.
If we need to use multiple angles to spot the contact, nevermind discuss yellow/red can it be considered a C&O mistake?That has to be a freekick, I was critical of a referee decision last week where the referee was unable to see the incident to make a call, this week we have a ref who has seen the incident but by judging, no foul, has made for me, a clear and obvious error.
Its also a sanction, reckless for me, I would also be open to someone talking it up to a red card, I dont agree its a red but i would understand if they did
one thing it quite simply is, is a foul.
random guess referee saw the Wolves player stay on his feet, deemed it a 50 50, whereas had the Wolves player have went down instantly, the brain might have come to the correct call.
Conceptually, yes it could be. If it is clear and obvious in those angles. Error in this context isn't about saying "bad ref, you missed that!" but about something that is missed and is clear.If we need to use multiple angles to spot the contact, nevermind discuss yellow/red can it be considered a C&O mistake?
If we need to use multiple angles to spot the contact, nevermind discuss yellow/red can it be considered a C&O mistake?