The Ref Stop

VAR query

K

Kent Ref

RefChat Addict
A question i was asked last night:

Team A appeals for a penalty. Referee says No.

Play goes on and Team B scores a goal 20 seconds later.

The referee gets called to the monitor to review "his error" and awards a penalty to team A.

Does Team B's goal still stand?
 
The Ref Stop
Am I correct in saying that, for example, if the player took their shirt off in celebration of the (soon to be disallowed) goal, then the caution would still stand? i.e. any disciplinary action still stands, even if the decision doesn’t.
 
Another example. Ref no-call on tackle just outside the PA. Non reviewable. Other team, gaining possession from the tackle, breaks down the field and scores. That tackle becomes reviewable and the goal can be wiped and the attacking DFK just ouside the PA awarded.

The difference form a PK is that it could be awarded in thhe OP even if there had been multiple changes of possession, so long s play had not been stopped and restarted, but the DFK would only work if the foul is what started the APP.
 
Kent Ref said:
A question i was asked last night:

Team A appeals for a penalty. Referee says No.

Play goes on and Team B scores a goal 20 seconds later.

The referee gets called to the monitor to review "his error" and awards a penalty to team A.

Does Team B's goal still stand?
Click to expand...
They would let the goal stand however
They'd make it up and find a way (most likely by brushing over the obvious PK by saying it wasn't C&O... obviously ;) something along those lines).
I can't believe we haven't had a glaring example of this issue in the EPL, because 2-bites of the cherry is another inevitable calamity wating to happen
 
Big Cat said:
They would let the goal stand however
They'd make it up and find a way (most likely by brushing over the obvious PK by saying it wasn't C&O... obviously ;) something along those lines).
I can't believe we haven't had a glaring example of this issue in the EPL, because 2-bites of the cherry is another inevitable calamity wating to happen
Click to expand...
We have had one. I can't remember the game, but it was a back pass scenario which the same period of possession ultimately led to a goal. It was determined that the back pass was not part of the APP.
It is ambiguous though. The APP is not clearly and objectively defined anywhere.
 
RefereeX said:
We have had one. I can't remember the game, but it was a back pass scenario which the same period of possession ultimately led to a goal. It was determined that the back pass was not part of the APP.
It is ambiguous though. The APP is not clearly and objectively defined anywhere.
Click to expand...
It was Brentford 2-2 Wolves, Wolves' first goal. Common sense should have seen that goal disallowed (and I'm a Wolves fan admitting that!).
 
Gabriel said:
It was Brentford 2-2 Wolves, Wolves' first goal. Common sense should have seen that goal disallowed (and I'm a Wolves fan admitting that!).
Click to expand...
I'm gonna disagree 😆 the ball ended up back with the goalkeeper again after that initial possession before having to go all the way up field and go in the net. There's no way that can be part of the APP, so then it comes down to whether football wants every event since the ball last changed possession or last went out of play to be reviewed in the case of a goal. I don't think it wants that.
 
RefereeX said:
I'm gonna disagree 😆 the ball ended up back with the goalkeeper again after that initial possession before having to go all the way up field and go in the net. There's no way that can be part of the APP, so then it comes down to whether football wants every event since the ball last changed possession or last went out of play to be reviewed in the case of a goal. I don't think it wants that.
Click to expand...
Tbh I'd forgotten about that. I haven't seen it back since the day after the game because we're that bad I can't bear to watch any of our highlights 😆 In that case it's fair enough, and ultimately sounds like football got what it expected...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top