I know Brian.
That's why I typed "outfield player".
Reading while watching TV
I know Brian.
That's why I typed "outfield player".
Reading while watching TV
The outcome is irrelevant. Was it a deliberate kick? Was the keeper the intended target?Corner kick because you couldn't call that a deliberate action. It may have been an intended deliberate action but the outcome was not as intended
Question for you, and all;
Defended attempts to play a pass to keeper, but chips it too high (think Dixon if you remember it) and it's going over the keeper's head and in the goal. With an acrobatic backwards dive, he tips it over the bar for a corner. Defender apologises, everyone laughs, attacking team set up for a corner and there's no appeals.
What do you do...?
Question for you, and all;
Defended attempts to play a pass to keeper, but chips it too high (think Dixon if you remember it) and it's going over the keeper's head and in the goal. With an acrobatic backwards dive, he tips it over the bar for a corner. Defender apologises, everyone laughs, attacking team set up for a corner and there's no appeals.
What do you do...?
2 ways to deal with this imo...
1) The easy way; point to the corner. No-one really cares and they appear to have accepted the fact that it's a corner. Referee still has positive match control and everyone's happy. Assessor not so much...
Question for you, and all;
Defended attempts to play a pass to keeper, but chips it too high (think Dixon if you remember it) and it's going over the keeper's head and in the goal. With an acrobatic backwards dive, he tips it over the bar for a corner. Defender apologises, everyone laughs, attacking team set up for a corner and there's no appeals.
What do you do...?
You can't remove it completely. While the element of intent was removed from the Laws of the Game for most offences in 1995 it still remains for others. Since "deliberately" and "intentionally" mean the same thing, intent is still a consideration for handling offences and for this offence, since the word "deliberately" is part of the wording.Try and re-write the sentance with the "intent".
Best bit of advice I received was "remove the word intent from your reffing vocabulary and see if you still come to the same decision."
wW can never know what another person's intent is, so we must remove that possability. At the Pro level there may be an element of a known or assumed intenet. but guys that you see once or twice a season , na.
"Spirit of the Game" eh Brian?It would be all too easy to crucify a referee for failing to apply law to the letter but the competencies require an understanding of how football works before applying law
Since "deliberately" and "intentionally" mean the same thing,.
They do not.
de·lib·er·ate
adjective
dəˈlib(ə)rət/
- done consciously and intentionally.
Has last weeks ref been breeding around these parts recently?
You did say you hadn't been around for a while because you and your partner had recently had a baby @HertsFinest?
If you look at that last post, with no knowledge of past posts, it kinda looks like you're saying the kid is ruffles?