Middle Man
Member
Any thoughts on the red card in this game?
Yes I agree with that. If it was in the penalty area then it would have been a YC and PK. No treble punishment when awarding the FK (excluding position but that was a mistake).Surely the card was for dogso, not serious foul play?
During the match it was reported by the media as DOGSO, but post-match, that was clarified to SFP.It was given for DOGSO according to 'Goals on Sunday'. I agree, it won't get overturned, however, SFP would have been a better fit on the basis that it was arguably dangerous (despite having got some of the ball)
OK, trust the Sky pundits to get it wrong!! This was one where everyone down the pub was saying, "but he got the ball". Most fans are cluelessDuring the match it was reported by the media as DOGSO, but post-match, that was clarified to SFP.
This was really poor by Pawson. It illustrates that he lost situational awareness, probably because he had doubts about the dismissal and was then distracted by the playersAgree with how good the call was but location of the free kick was very poor for a PL referee especially when it contributing to a goal. Albeit a cracking free kick goal.
View attachment 2332
View attachment 2333
He is standing where the ball should have been. A good 6 yards in that area is a huge advantage.
That and the free kick is positioned closer to the PA than the further most part of penalty arc which we know is 10 yards so player should be positioned further back than the spot. There are pitch markings here that can be used for accurate positioning of defensive walls.While I have my critic hat on, the wall was set short at around 8 yards too (the grass cuttings change shade every 6 yards).
View attachment 2334