We know your views on this, you've made them clear probably hundreds of times. I don't necessarily disagree by the way, but it is getting better. Ten years ago for 7-6 and 6-5 promotion boards we got presented with club marks and they were looked at with equal weighting as assessor marks, these days we don't even get to see the club marks at those levels unless there is a very good reason to do so (e.g. not enough observations).
At higher levels they count less, unless it has changed recently then at L3 observer marks carry double the weight of club marks. Also at L4 it is extremely rare for a referee to be A for clubs and E for observers, or vice versa, or even B/D or D/B. More often than not they are the same band or only one band difference. Similar at L3, whilst there aren't bands it is rare to see someone top 50 for clubs and bottom 50 for observers or vice versa, rather they tend to be more closely aligned. All of which suggests observers and clubs are presenting similar views on the referee's performance.